Path: news.nzbot.com!spool1.sonic-news.com!news-out.sonic-news.com!not.news-service.com!not.alt.net!not.highwinds-media.com!s02-b53!textbe01-phx!hwmnpeer02.phx!hw-filter.phx!hwmnpeer01.phx!hwmnpeer01.lga!hwmnpeer01.ams!news.highwinds-media.com!feeder4.cambrium.nl!feed.tweaknews.nl!feed.xsnews.nl!border-3.ams.xsnews.nl!feeder.news-service.com!news.alt.net
From: Naughty Boy <naughtynaughty>
Newsgroups: alt.fan.utb.naughty-boy
Subject: Re: Don't Ask Don't Tell
Date: Sun, 18 May 2008 22:38:23 +0000 (UTC)
Organization: UTB
Lines: 31
Message-ID: <Xns9AA3588A52622utb@207.14.116.130>
References: <vktm145srh22ckc4sa835dquk952p18sjf@4ax.com> <482f3e96$0$26197$882e0bbb@news.ThunderNews.com>
User-Agent: Xnews/5.04.25
X-No-Archive: yes
Xref: news.nzbot.com alt.fan.utb.naughty-boy:1526
X-Received-Date: Sat, 17 Oct 2009 21:51:18 UTC (s02-b53)
"Homoaner" <homoaner@home.hut> wrote in news:482f3e96$0$26197
$882e0bbb@news.ThunderNews.com:
>
> On 2-May-2008, HMS Victor Victorian@NBG.net wrote:
>
>>
>> "These lists are not accessible to members of the public."
>
> This is exactly why, in the name of the freedom of speech of ALL people of
> the world, usenet needs a quick, very brief, shocking flood of pictures of
> nude children photoshopped (not very neatly or carefully, I think ) into
> on-topic picutres for all the picture groups.
>
> I wonder, can someone "batch process" the pasting of a neatly cropped naked
> boy into 1000s different of pictures at once?
>
> Perhaps one of the nudist films could have a news-crawl-styled announcement
> pasted on the bottom telling all users of usenet what IWF is doing and
> explain to them that if our groups are threatened, then so are theirs.
>
> Someone at IWF might decide that all people who enjoy pictures of toy
> poodles are suddenly pedophiles because they found a few photoshopped
> pictures of toy poodles with naked boys in them, or vice versa.
>
You idiots sure are worked up about people hating you.What did you expect?
--
Look at that. The one, the only, the original, the stupid Naughty Boy is
back. Who said Usenet couldn't go further downhill?
|
|