On Sat, 16 Jun 2007 03:28:25 GMT, HMS Victor Victorian
<VV@19thCent.net> wrote:
>There is a belief, now widely held as truth, derived from an
>interpretation of "normalcy" twisted by overtly repressive
>Judeo-Christian values, that the act of showing intimate physical and
>emotional affection by a man towards a boy does severe
>psycho-emotional damage to the boy.
>
>This is patently false.
>
>A true BoyLover is not motivated by reproduction, but by nostalgia. He
>seeks his own boyhood. He abhors and is incapable of harming a boy,
>for he would be harming himself..
>
>With the Gallery's approbation, I should like to modestly present my
>nostalgia.
>
>Thank you.
>
>VV
>
>God Save Her Majesty the Queen.
>God Preserve the Prince of Wales.
>Rule Britannia!
Sometimes the word "true BoyLover" has a bad taste. Especially since
the crazy Lord Roboboy is claiming it for his crazy suggestions.
Boylove is also, if one can identify with the role as boy and the role
of as man. In reallity and fantasy!
|
|
')){kind=link}