Path: news.nzbot.com!spool1.sonic-news.com!news-out.sonic-news.com!not.news-service.com!not.alt.net!not.highwinds-media.com!s02-b53!textbe01-phx!hwmnpeer02.phx!hw-filter.phx!hwmnpeer01.phx!news.highwinds-media.com!newsfeed.news2me.com!nx01.iad01.newshosting.com!newshosting.com!140.99.99.194.MISMATCH!news-in-02.newsfeed.easynews.com!easynews.com!easynews!easynews-local!fe10.news.easynews.com.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: HMS Victor Victorian <VV@19thCent.net>
Newsgroups: alt.fan.utb.naughty-boy
Subject: Re: Racism & BoyLovers explained
Organization: Her Majesty's Service
Reply-To: PrinceAlbert@RuleBritannia
Message-ID: <iehb63lcu4reo4vnsoj9enf681lhbp0afl@4ax.com>
References: <ae6b0c4f83fc197c1a9e76742ffd3a60@mixmaster.it>
X-Newsreader: Forte Agent 4.2/32.1118
X-No-Archive: yes
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Lines: 62
X-Complaints-To: abuse@easynews.com
X-Complaints-Info: Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers otherwise we will be unable to process your complaint properly.
Date: Tue, 05 Jun 2007 20:33:48 GMT
Xref: news.nzbot.com alt.fan.utb.naughty-boy:107
X-Received-Date: Sat, 17 Oct 2009 17:16:26 UTC (s02-b53)
On Tue, 5 Jun 2007 17:20:43 +0200 (CEST), George Orwell
<nobody@mixmaster.it> wrote:
>Why are most BLs in the groups white males... blah, blah, blah...
>
>Quite simple: The coons/slanty-eyes etc., do not have as
>much free access to computers/the internet/newsgroups
>etc., etc., etc.
>
>When they do, in a few years time, I am sure there will be
>as many darkies, chinks, japs, wogs, etc all gazing with
>lust on the boys of their choice. (And most of 'em will be
>gazing hungrily at white boys, sun-tanned, but with pure
>white buns from sunbathing in their speedos, and them
>darkies and other inferior races will be longing to eat
>them same buns. This shows: white is best as most of the
>world seems to lust after it. Interestingly, this seems to
>apply to white fish as well as white boy meat.)
>
>Now, your message was not quite so scientific after all,
>was it?
>
>Is this why you started your quasi intalekshal BL group?
>To "expose" racism in BLs?
>
>It is not racism. It is pure and natural male lust.
Ah ... thank you very much for your response. It is certainly thought
provoking, which was my intent. Again, thank you
Naughty-Boy Galleries, Ltd. was founded in the ruins of an old troll
group. We intended it as a forum to present the best in
youth-centered art, photography, and affection. Free discussion must
necessarily be a part of that forum. As you can see, up to this point
our success is mixed. We have hosted several prominent artists' work
here, have had very little or no disruptive contributions. Yet it
must be said that, although the Gallery is now widely accessed by
lurkers, as a recent survey of imgsrc.ru demonstrates, there has been
very little contribution of the constructive type, either to
exhibition or discussion.
Speaking personally, I did not represent my statement as being
"scientific" in any particular way other than stating that statistics
indicate the majority of Boy Lovers are white, male and European--but
not exclusively, of course. My second point, represented as simply
derived from my own observations over the years, is that there is an
implicit and occasionally explicit racism regarding the kinds of
pictures these gentleman prefer.
You believe that lusting after "white meat" [as if a boy were a baked
chicken] is "pure and natural". I find this assertion both
unsubstantiated and repugnant. I believe it is merely a product of
your own society's delusion.
As you have amply demonstrated, the racism--notably paired with your
ethnocentric point of view--is explicit. Thank you for making my
point.
Regards, VV
God Save Her Majesty the Queen.
God Preserve the Prince of Wales.
Rule Britannia!
|
|