In article <bp31631ud99sf1qjpoqgo72hd9i1itjut0@4ax.com>,
HMS Victor Victorian <VV@19thCent.net> wrote:
> On Fri, 01 Jun 2007 21:13:45 GMT, "Be@no" <Be@no.com> wrote:
>
> >On Fri, 01 Jun 2007 19:41:51 GMT, the non <myaddress@server.co> wrote:
> >
> >>In article <1lq063tb4iqrrbuvo18oos817sm5t2vpef@4ax.com>,
> >> HMS Victor Victorian <VV@19thCent.net> wrote:
> >>
> >>> Please note that the management, although solicitous of visual
> >>> contributions to the gallery, whether still photograph or video, does
> >>> not condone nor approve of the submission of this particular genre of
> >>> film. Please download with due caution.
> >>>
> >>> Thank you.
> >>> God Save Her Majesty the Queen.
> >>> God Preserve the Prince of Wales.
> >>> Rule Britannia!
> >>
> >>Thankfully, not all Brits are blue noses - some of them are quite raunchy
> >
> >
> >Yeah and not all of them like the queen
> >
> >
> >Hang all the royals!!!
>
> Criticise not dear Elizabeth, for anyone who is so compelled to wear
> such outrageous hats deserves our sincere indulgence and sympathy.
> Bloody Roundheads!
> LOL.
>
> Welcome, gentlemen. Your reputations precede you.
>
> I can assure you, I am no Cavalier and no relation to Albert ... but
> you must confess, Blairs may come and Blairs may go, as so went the
> Iron Hen, but the British Monarchy endures forever.
>
> As I understand it, the Royals have a particular penchant for their
> own style of raunchy behaviour.
>
>
>
>
> "That which is not just is not law"
Your remark about QEII and her hats (and I concur!) reminds me of what
Mark Twain said about Brigham Young (probably paraphrased): "He must
have been a saint to marry all those homely women!"
|
|