On Sat, 09 Sep 2006 11:06:20 GMT, DinGaDong <up@yours.com> wrote:
>In article <080920062340049684%%+15$-Y-Not@here-and.there>, %+15$-Y-
>Not@here-and.there says...
>> In article <0001HW.C127628A007585F3F0284530@news.easynews.com>,
>> Morpheus <Morpheus@Deamland.org> wrote:
>>
>> > On Fri, 8 Sep 2006 14:55:11 -0700, C0s/Mos,=',np:-F4,9 wrote
>> > (in article <3FlMg.141412$TD2.123744@fe08.news.easynews.com>):
>> >
>> > > Morpheus <Morpheus@Deamland.org> wrote in
>> > > news:0001HW.C126088600246D3BF0284530@news.easynews.com:
>> > >
>> > >> On Thu, 7 Sep 2006 06:26:03 -0700, Y-Not:: wrote
>> > >> (in article <070920060924006491%%+15$-Y-Not@here-and.there>):
>> > >>
>> > >>
>> > >>>
>> > >>> Y Not
>> > >>>
>> > >>>
>> > >>> PS.
>> > >>> I don't want to be doing any of this.
>> > >>
>> > >>
>> > >> Breathtaking.
>> > >>
>> > >> Another 2000 words of "I don't want to be doing any of this."
>> > >>
>> > >>
>> > >> Positively breathtaking.
>> > >>
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> .......
>> > >
>> > > Positively breathtaking. No not really, Haven't we become accustomed to
>> > > expect no less than this torrent of convoluted garbage associated to?
>> > > This self-proclaimed saviour of the boy lover community!
>> > > Anything less would be cause for concern.
>> > >
>> > > Cosmos
>> > >
>> > >
>> > >
>> >
>> > I suppose you're right. But less 'saviorism' would be more cause for
>> > celebration than cause for concern, though, don't you think?
>> >
>>
>> So, what you two are saying is that you don't want me to help people?
>> That not only do you not want to do it yourself, you want me to stop
>> doing it too? That you don't want them to have the security help that
>> you don't care to provide yourself, and don't want me to provide it
>> either? And that you would celebrate the increased danger that would
>> put your fellow BLs in?
>> That sure isn't very charitable of you.
>> Actually, it's downright ah, bad.
>>
>> If you don't want me to remind you of all the good I do and you don't,
>> don't post to oppose me, that would prompt me to correct your lies. One
>> would think you might have thought of that. You also might try to do
>> some good yourself, instead of the opposite. Then you might have a
>> little credibility in this. Until then, when you do this you look
>> awfully bad, and against this community. Of course, such an obvious
>> thing should be easy for you to understand. So why don't you?
>>
>>
>> Y Not
>>
>>
>> PS.
>> Do you and Cosmos want to forget the help I've given directly to YOU?
>> And the things you may have benefited from others of my posts? Would
>> you rather I had never helped you? Would you rather I had helped no
>> one?
>> What will people think of you, who have seen me do this for you, and
>> for THEM? That you wish to be ungrateful, is as usual with the selfish,
>> but to oppose it means you want to cause others harm. Is this what you
>> really want people to see of you?
>>
>> --
>>
>
>Same old same old. Just a different group on a different day.
>He's crossed more lines than normal in the last couple of weeks, bringing
>his old attention seeking shite into this group is just one of them.
>Recently, he's received little or no attention, and this, IMHO, is why
>this group has been infested. The unprovoked attack on Mephi caused a
>reaction and the attention seekers poorly fingers have once again got a
>good work out! Sorry Mephi, Morph Cos, and I suppose me as well with this
>little ditty. We've all given him exactly what he craves... Attention...
>Collectively, we that oppose, should all do a Q and bozo bin him and any
>others we believe to be him. But, that's easier said than done.
>Dare I be the one to give Mephi advice but what the heck. If/when again in
>the future you are on the receiving end of this kind of shite, just
>remember who it is that's doing the attacking and lying about you b4
>taking action. And remember that the majority of the target audience have
>read it all before and are more than capable of dismissing it as shite!
>The problem is, and the reason he has got us all by the balls. After an
>attack, such as the one on Mephi, the target may not see a defence mounted
>by any of his friends because they've decided not to respond so not to
>make matters worse. The target will be champing at the bit wanting to
>rebuke the bullshit posts and the targets friends will be too.
>Remember, he's an attention seeker but he's not thick. He knows that
>someone, be it the target or one of the targets friends, will post to
>rebuke. This has happened a thousand times before and round and round and
>round we go where we'll stop..............
>The only way to beat this virus is collectively. We've all, those that
>oppose, somehow got to rise above him. Come to some sort of collective
>decision that he spiels shite and he's just best ignored! Until we can all
>do that as one we're up the swanny without a paddle! We've all tried
>playing him at his own game and it just doesn't work. If we beat him at it
>he changes the rules or cheats. The next time his ball comes over your
>garden fence just think twice before kicking it back! Saying that, he may
>call the police and have you arrested for theft. (Sorry guys, I'd imagine
>only Mephi will get that *little* joke.)
>
>
>D
Time to sweep out the trash.....
|
|
')){kind=link}