On Tue, 05 Sep 2006 10:52:33 GMT, Mephistopheles
<no-fixed@address.net> wrote:
>To Y-Not:-
>
>For several months now, this group which had lain dormant, has seen a
>wonderful coming together of various posters. Every exchange in this
>group has been of the friendliest, both in giving & receiving. This
>was an outstandingly happy, harmonious group. Until you came trampling
>in to launch yet another poisonous but quite laughable assault on me.
>
>In my comments in the "Back to Basics" thread above, I had shared your
>disappointment & had not uttered a single unfavorable word against
>you.........Yet you fell on me with your customary ill-tempered fury.
>What is it, that is festering away so insidiously inside you? Why does
>my nic so turn your head?
>
>To the general reader
>
>I shall not lower myself to reprint YN's incredible assault on me,
>which includes some 15 unsubstantiated Slanders, not one of which
>would stand up in an English Court!
>
>My alleged treatment of Romeo seems to be what sticks in his craw the
>most.. And he builds on that lie to diss everything I stand for in
>every single group, & all the people "who have left", he lays not at
>his door, but at mine!!!!!!!!!!!
>
>So, as my latest crime seems to be involved with Romeo, let's look at
>"The Romeo lie".
>
>Some weeks ago in Chris I noticed several posters making reference to
>a certain Romeo, but no Romeo post appeared anywhere on my screen.
>So I started a thread asking:- "Is Easynews being Picky again?"
>
>****** 1.- Here is that post :-
>
>" I see, from the 15 plus JAMMer thread, references made to TWO posts
>by some wannabee "Romeo".........?
>
>"There is no record of any post by Romeo on my server."
>
>****** 2.-
>
>17 minutes later, before any replies came through, I wrote:-
>
>"Well, bugger me. The plot thickens.
>"The missing posts downloaded using Outlook Express.
>
>"So it ain't EN, but something Agent doesn't like about Shakespeare
>characters.
>
>"Any ideas, Q?"
>
>*****All pretty innocuous stuff, so far. After all, I HAD NOT seen a
>single Romeo post, & he could turn out to be my best buddie.
>
>***** 3,- Then, out of the blue, this from Romeo:-
>
>>So you are some illustrious person, are you Mephistopheles?.
>>Then i'll get a lot of enemies if i say fuck you!, or better fuck you bastard!"
>
>***** 4.- So I, for the FIRST & ONLY exchange I had with him, on
>being called "a fucking bastard", simply toyed whimsically with his
>OWN addy, giving its dictionary definition, as follows:-
>
>"cenobite", vid. "coenobite"
>
>"From "coenobium":- a colony of unicellular organisms".
>"I didn't know which bit to laugh at most; "colony" or "unicellular"
>
>"It would appear then that the question of your identity has
>satisfactorily resolved itself, without any speculation on my part.
>After all, I am not given to that sort of thing. LOL."
>
>END OF ALL CORRESPONDENCE with Romeo. Yep, folks, that was it. No foul
>language in my reply.
>
>After that, the incident dismissed from my mind, I posted some music
>for gollum
>
>Then, a note to Ghost on his Globe piccy
>
>And finally, to round off my brief visit to Chris, a merry little poem
>"Who killed cock robin?"
>
>I never instigated any exchanges with Romeo, He did that himsel, & I
>gave him but one reply, as above..
>
>My interest in his direction currently is NIL.
>
>NOW BACK TO Y-NOT
>
>So, isn't it about time you started making apologies for a change, for
>this bloated screed of invective against me?
>
>Again, I am only confronting you with plain facts, not abusing your
>person.
>
>This will be my only post to you on this matter in Smeagol. For this
>is not the place for rubbishing people. Stick to Chris for all such
>vituperative attacks on all & sundry.....not that you'll find me there
>all that often.
>
>Mephi
replied to elsewhere
|
| Follow-ups: | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 | 20 | 21 | 22 | 23 |
|