Path: news.nzbot.com!not-for-mail
From: **PCZ** <**PCZ**@domain.com>
Newsgroups: alt.binaries.tvshows
Subject: Re: PCZ question on StaxRip Settings THANKS for the extra info!
X-Newsreader: NewsLeecher v7.0 Final (http://www.newsleecher.com)
References: <2017111806195362590-sedria@snusaretasty.com>
Lines: 48
Message-ID: <ddWPB.15444$1M.11004@fx32.am4>
X-Complaints-To: abuse(at)newshosting.com
NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 18 Nov 2017 13:04:09 UTC
Organization: Newshosting.com - Highest quality at a great price! www.newshosting.com
Date: Sat, 18 Nov 2017 13:04:09 GMT
X-Received-Body-CRC: 2842681109
X-Received-Bytes: 1975
Xref: news.nzbot.com alt.binaries.tvshows:5475
In reply to "Sedria" who wrote the following:
> On 2017-11-18 04:50:30 +0000, **PCZ** said:
>
> > I upped 2 test files.
> > They are the same episode.
> >
> > Encoded with the same 1024 video bitrate restriction.
> > One file encoded about 20x faster than the other.
> >
> > I would be interested to hear what folks think about the differences between
> > them and which file they think took the slow path.
> >
> > I kept the filesize small, if this was a release i would increase filesize
> > to
> > around 700Mb.
>
> Since you asked.
>
> It seems to me the test-file-a is of lesser quality compared to test-file-b.
>
> For all practical purposes they are pretty close.
>
> The a-file seems to lose some quality on moving objects then snap in
> when still.
>
> The b-file seems to flow better, not losing bits with rapid movements.
>
> But either are perfectly acceptable to me.
b was done using the CPU
time around 70m
a was done using NVENC
time around 3m
--
----------------------------------------- --- -- -
Posted with NewsLeecher v7.0 Final
Free Newsreader @ http://www.newsleecher.com/
------------------------------- ----- ---- -- -
|
|