Path: news.nzbot.com!not-for-mail
From: Sedria <sedria@snusaretasty.com>
Newsgroups: alt.binaries.tvshows
Message-ID: <2017111806195362590-sedria@snusaretasty.com>
References: <zcMPB.3268$wT4.2220@fx09.iad> <q_OPB.48869$B52.37645@fx04.am4>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Subject: Re: PCZ question on StaxRip Settings THANKS for the extra info!
User-Agent: Unison/2.2
Lines: 28
X-Complaints-To: abuse@tweaknews.nl
NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 18 Nov 2017 12:19:54 UTC
Organization: Tweaknews
Date: Sat, 18 Nov 2017 06:19:53 -0600
X-Received-Body-CRC: 150152213
X-Received-Bytes: 1600
Xref: news.nzbot.com alt.binaries.tvshows:5467
On 2017-11-18 04:50:30 +0000, **PCZ** said:
> I upped 2 test files.
> They are the same episode.
>
> Encoded with the same 1024 video bitrate restriction.
> One file encoded about 20x faster than the other.
>
> I would be interested to hear what folks think about the differences between
> them and which file they think took the slow path.
>
> I kept the filesize small, if this was a release i would increase filesize to
> around 700Mb.
Since you asked.
It seems to me the test-file-a is of lesser quality compared to test-file-b.
For all practical purposes they are pretty close.
The a-file seems to lose some quality on moving objects then snap in
when still.
The b-file seems to flow better, not losing bits with rapid movements.
But either are perfectly acceptable to me.
|
|