alt.binaries.tv.big-brotherPrev. Next
Re: WAS THERE A BBUK DAY 58? no there was not
nitram (memyself&i@nowhere.com) 2014/08/15 15:01

Path: news.nzbot.com!news.astraweb.com!border2.newsrouter.astraweb.com!feed.news.qwest.net!mpls-nntp-03.inet.qwest.net!feeder.erje.net!eu.feeder.erje.net!newspeer1.nac.net!border2.nntp.dca1.giganews.com!border1.nntp.dca1.giganews.com!buffer1.nntp.dca1.giganews.com!border1.nntp.dca3.giganews.com!backlog3.nntp.dca3.giganews.com!Xl.tags.giganews.com!border1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!local2.nntp.dca.giganews.com!news.giganews.com.POSTED!not-for-mail
NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 15 Aug 2014 16:01:02 -0500
From: nitram <memyself&i@nowhere.com>
Newsgroups: alt.binaries.tv.big-brother
Subject: Re: WAS THERE A BBUK DAY 58? no there was not
Date: Fri, 15 Aug 2014 17:01:06 -0400
Message-ID: <f5tsu99nbsqkl79jiojjgsbbrhk73bjkgc@4ax.com>
References: <ra8ru91ob4q09kmeiogu3am4kmufro4tnj@4ax.com> <58bru9tusb91i54noigunikp6ooqttafd4@4ax.com>
X-Newsreader: Forte Agent 6.00/32.1186
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Lines: 8
X-Usenet-Provider: http://www.giganews.com
X-Trace: sv3-UegzLIYsYX71Bnkx6i9cSNAXqZoVkdcH2VWfQddHWQHXMUrNuCzFXmqT2L7ZZPNrzmMGTQT4e4ytGQU!x6q4LMWlfcY9U8rdNbsa/YGDVYz5tPZdOb6nt7jtkxBVwe6RAJgEOqAao6Ggo3vsbVSG33Brrg==
X-Complaints-To: abuse@giganews.com
X-DMCA-Notifications: http://www.giganews.com/info/dmca.html
X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers
X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Otherwise we will be unable to process your complaint properly
X-Postfilter: 1.3.40
X-Original-Bytes: 1452
Xref: news.nzbot.com alt.binaries.tv.big-brother:218

>On Fri, 15 Aug 2014 01:50:49 -0500, 1@2.com wrote:

>no there was not

yes there was, it was the Zoe eviction.  however, it was labeled
S15E58A instead of S15D58A.

nit

Follow-ups:12
Next Prev. Article List         Favorite