On Sat, 20 Oct 2012 19:09:12 +0100, Crystallizer
<crystallizer@this.group> wrote:
>x2lls wrote:
>
>> Finally, we have agreement.
>
>We don't have agreement. We have you failing
>to recognize that you were being mocked!
>
>
>> No, the evidence I posted was proof of SC girls being aware of action
>> by SC.
>
>You have been told 5 times now that posting a collection
>of keyboard characters to a newsgroup is not "proof" of
>anything. Anybody can concoct a message supposedly from
>someone else and that's what you did because you're a
>troll. That's what trolls do.
>
>> Nothing more, nothing less, simples. Even if the stuff posted
>> here IS a hoax, it doesn't detract from what is ACTUALLY happening.
>
>Nothing is happening, other than trolls getting busy masquerading
>as SC girls and their webmaster.
>
>> probably a good early warning so's posters can avoid. Are you so thick
>> so as not to know that? Jeez, you must be so backward, you have
>> reversing lights fitted behind your ears!!
>
>What's the point of resorting to insults when you can't get
>anyone to swallow your bullshit? It doesn't make that
>bullshit any more convincing. We've told you twice about
>"ad hominem".
>>
>> On a more serious note, besides the laugh that all other SC group
>> followers, and you two trolls , (Hi DOOM, alright mate?), are having,
>> at your delusional argument,
>> you have a wonderful way of 'attempting' to avoid the truth. Face it,
>> every group that goes tits up, is one less of your kingdom.
>> How long now until you realise that when you are up to your arse in
>> alligators, it is difficult to remind yourself, that your initial
>> task, was to drain the swamp!.
>
>What have you been smoking? Stay at Supernews and send
>us some more messages. Make sure they are supposed to be
>from SC. Use the same news server, use the same computer,
>use the same ISP, use the same trial edition of Forte Agent
>and follow it up with the same overkill bullshit. We love
>it. Whatever you do, don't try too hard thinking about how
>to concoct a convincing message or somebody might believe it.
>
>> Who has been claiming to be king of usenet for at least two decades?
>
>I don't think anyone has been "claiming". The actual King
>is, of course, JoeBlob.
>
>
>> Who has been reposting for at least two decades?
>
>Fishnet Fred. But Joe updates allover30.com, Mature.NL,
>and many other sites twice a week and has done so
>for at least 15 years.
>
>
>> I am not looking for followers
>
>That must be a big relief for you. Look at the title
>of the group. People come here for SC pictures, so I
>think your plan of not looking for followers is a
>reasonable one because you won't get them.
>
>
>> Favor is not a condition I wish for
>
>Another relief. Why would a troll concocting fake SC
>messages be looking for favor? Seems like you are
>making blinding statements of the obvious.
>> >
>
>>
>> So, I am NOW an outcast troll?.
>
>Correct
>
>
>
>> By that thinking, I have never been a
>> troll until now, which means you have been telling porkies all these
>> years. And there's me thinking I was in favor of all those others you
>> have accused in the past.
>
>You've always been a troll, as long as any of us
>can remember - years and years. Further, you have never
>been ANYTHING ELSE. If you don't know that you have greater
>problems than we first identified.
>
>
>
>>
>> Now, a traitor is someone who was once a part of a group or nation.
>> The said individual, has then gone on to cause damage or injury to
>> other members of the group to which they belonged
>
>Not quite. In a traitor's early days he is often STILL
>a member of his group. Sometimes the traitor can taint
>the group by virtue of the "bad apple" syndrome. That's
>what we will definitely prevent as far as you and your
>little SC and SC girls "messages" are concerned.
>>
>
>> Make up your mind Josephine, either you know, or you don't. If you
>> think you told me, I can assist you by informing you that you have
>> been telling me over and over and over and over and over again.
>
>Can somebody translate that please?
>>
>> I'm older than you, and probably know more about life than you will
>> ever do.
>
>There you go again. You've posted a few text characters above and
>you believe that it's absolutely true. It isn't. If you
>knew anything about life you would know that you can't fool
>people by concocting hopelessly amateurish threats from SC.
>>
>> Now I suggest you scuttle off to your gambling site.
>
>See, you've got that wrong too. Better go back and find out
>what the site is. The word "gambling" has NEVER been used
>in its description. We suggest you scuttle off to get
>your facts right.
>
>
>Bye now!
|
|