On Wed, 12 Sep 2012 23:46:53 +0100, JoeBlob <joe@blob.com> wrote:
>I will re-iterate my earlier message to the group......
>
>
>Southern Charms do not, repeat DO NOT hold the copyrights
>for any of the models on their numerous sites. Each is
>operated on a franchise to the model concerned and it
>is the actual model who holds the copyright. Also it
>is the actual model who must process the litigation.
>
>Think of it this way - Southern Charms get their money
>from the models so they stuff that in their pocket
>regardless of how successful or otherwise that model's
>site is. They don't care two monkey's testicles if any
>model is having copyright issues because it's nothing
>to do with them - THEY GET THEIR MONEY ANYWAY.
>
>Listen, Southern Charms models are amateurs trying to
>scratch an income from a few crappily produced
>photographs. Most don't have the resources to fight
>DMCA battles (except a few of the richer ones like
>Sugarbabe). So please don't be fooled by hoax
>"messages" ostensibly from Southern Charms posted
>in this group. Their operators are fat, dumb and happy.
>The last thing they would want to waste time on is
>spouting bullshit into a newsgroup which, until
>recently, was a brilliant source of free advertising
>for them.
>
>Use logic, guys!
>
>
>
>Joe (Usenet King)
"a few crappily produced photographs"
Glad to hear you say that...after years of you flooding the
seniors/older groups with them in an attempt to run off the posters of
quality material. I believe you called your SC floods the only
"worthwhile" picks, back then??? But, you also posted floods of
trannies and extremely hirsute people...so why anyone would give
creedance to anything you spout is a mystery.
Your just a knob, Joe.
|
| Follow-ups: | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 |
|