Path: news.nzbot.com!news.astraweb.com!border2.newsrouter.astraweb.com!feed.news.qwest.net!mpls-nntp-03.inet.qwest.net!195.208.113.67.MISMATCH!goblin1!goblin.stu.neva.ru!enother.net!enother.net!peer01.iad.highwinds-media.com!news.highwinds-media.com!feed-me.highwinds-media.com!post01.iad.highwinds-media.com!fx19.iad.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Tarkus@here.com
Newsgroups: alt.binaries.sleazemovies
Subject: Re: Ping Tarkus
Message-ID: <lnnls9hr513vtbp139t6d54rhe2am1t2cn@4ax.com>
References: <pbljs9d19b6cp8hk7m8kuq8ouhpg1802k7@4ax.com> <os0ls9d1og231iuborbpb2l3j5e1gsft4o@4ax.com> <t92ls9hdluhcbuahn4i4jvfdavpkrol3be@4ax.com> <624ls95b6eeoan82mhphtujjqmk6273p42@4ax.com> <XnsA36F731B38F78trastrastras@69.16.179.27> <83fls9968qbk3dft5t2emkntn81ofmoibd@4ax.com> <XnsA36F83BD69628trastrastras@69.16.179.27> <pglls99iaatbif6fl6pn2hmuth1o66itq1@4ax.com>
User-Agent: ForteAgent/7.10.32.1212
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Lines: 29
X-Complaints-To: abuse@easynews.com
Organization: Easynews - www.easynews.com
X-Complaints-Info: Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers otherwise we will be unable to process your complaint properly.
Date: Sat, 19 Jul 2014 17:13:02 -0400
X-Received-Bytes: 2305
X-Received-Body-CRC: 2117810998
Xref: news.nzbot.com alt.binaries.sleazemovies:30
On Sat, 19 Jul 2014 16:35:56 -0400, Clive <Clive@Outdoors.Com> wrote:
>On Sat, 19 Jul 2014 19:56:50 GMT, mjello <non.compos@ment.is> wrote:
>
>>Tarkus@here.com wrote in news:83fls9968qbk3dft5t2emkntn81ofmoibd@4ax.com:
>>
>>> alt.porn vs. alt.notporn debate.
>>
>>It sure would be nice to hear some other voices....
>>
>>It's not exactly what you're talking about, but "sleazy" was part of my
>>vocabulary decades ago and it meant cheap, disreputable, sordid, shabby,
>>etc., i.e., it had nothing to do with salacity or eroticism. Hotels could
>>be sleazy. Some characters were sleazy. Movies were not sleazy, but they
>>might be about sleazy characters in sleazy hotels.
>>
>>It sure would be nice to hear some other voices....
>
>I agree that more voices on the topic would be nice and thanks to you
>both for you input. I don't think I'll ever have anything that meets
>the 60-70 grindhouse, unless of course I've gotten it here. I'm fine
>with not posting here, so long as those who do post know that I
>appreciate all they do and would post if I could...
I don't think there needs to be lock out of anything post 1979 but at
the same time simply because there is a lesbian scene or a boob shot
hardly makes it sleaze these days.. ;)
Ie: TFE seems pretty sleazy to me.
|
|