On Sat, 19 Jul 2014 19:56:50 GMT, mjello <non.compos@ment.is> wrote:
>Tarkus@here.com wrote in news:83fls9968qbk3dft5t2emkntn81ofmoibd@4ax.com:
>
>> alt.porn vs. alt.notporn debate.
>
>It sure would be nice to hear some other voices....
>
>It's not exactly what you're talking about, but "sleazy" was part of my
>vocabulary decades ago and it meant cheap, disreputable, sordid, shabby,
>etc., i.e., it had nothing to do with salacity or eroticism. Hotels could
>be sleazy. Some characters were sleazy. Movies were not sleazy, but they
>might be about sleazy characters in sleazy hotels.
>
>It sure would be nice to hear some other voices....
I agree that more voices on the topic would be nice and thanks to you
both for you input. I don't think I'll ever have anything that meets
the 60-70 grindhouse, unless of course I've gotten it here. I'm fine
with not posting here, so long as those who do post know that I
appreciate all they do and would post if I could...
|
|