On Sat, 19 Jul 2014 11:07:51 -0400, Clive <Clive@Outdoors.Com> wrote:
>On Sat, 19 Jul 2014 10:47:44 -0400, Tarkus@here.com wrote:
>
>>On Fri, 18 Jul 2014 22:21:36 -0400, Clive <Clive@Outdoors.Com> wrote:
>>
>>>Hello Tarkus,
>>>
>>>Thanks again for the biker flicks!
>>>
>>>I'd like your opinion on these 2 - if I should post them here:
>>>tt0166924 and tt2082156
>>>
>>>I would post them as md - 2001 and tfe - 2013.
>>>
>>>Thanks!
>>>
>>>Clive
>>
>>MD - I have a pretty hard time accepting anything by David Lynch as
>>sleaze not to mention it has a rating of 8 so I in my opinion it
>>really does not belong here.
>>
>>TFE - Then there is this piece of shit that seems to prove that even
>>with 60 years of learning opportunities people can still make bad
>>sleazy movies; probably unintentionally. ;)
>
>Thanks for the feedback. I agree that even with the "les" scenes, MD
>really isn't sleeze. I wasn't overly impressed with TFE either, even
>with all the T&A (mostly T), so I don't think I'll post it unless
>someone wants it.
In the days far gone by there used to be Charters for newsgroups that
were approved a group of self appointed leaders, who I sometimes
suspected were the cast offs from the Hitler Youth, that essentially
indicated what could and could not be posted into groups. If you
contravened the charter the Usenet ISPs of the day would normally warn
the user and if the effort continued then users actually had their
access to Usenet suspended and even their account canceled.
Now there are times I wonder if it wouldn't be easier to simply have
two binary groups:
Alt.Porn
Alt.Notporn
That said this groups stems from a number of groups that are long
since forgotten and to an extent is a victim of its own success. If
we consider sleaze or sexploitation as primarily a function of the
1960-1970s grind house effort there is only so much product out there.
Granted a great deal of it is probably gone forever or lying on
16/35mm film reels, (hopefully in a chilled environment or the film is
slowly dying), but there are fewer and fewer new finds so I suppose
for the newsgroup to survive we have to consider broadening what was
the original idea of sleaze.
What that is I do not know. I guess use your best judgment.
|
|