| Re: Webeweb, Sandi, I thought.... |
|
| NâCN (NâCN@risk.com) |
2011/11/29 21:39 |
Path: news.nzbot.com!news.astraweb.com!border2.newsrouter.astraweb.com!border4.nntp.dca.giganews.com!border2.nntp.dca.giganews.com!border3.nntp.dca.giganews.com!Xl.tags.giganews.com!border1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!local2.nntp.dca.giganews.com!news.giganews.com.POSTED!not-for-mail
NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 29 Nov 2011 22:39:04 -0600
Newsgroups: alt.binaries.pictures.webeweb
Subject: Re: Webeweb, Sandi, I thought....
Date: Tue, 29 Nov 2011 20:39:05 -0800
Message-ID: <7mcbd7td3vql98obpabv2v88bthmhs1nin@4ax.com>
References: <scn8d7tc4oqm57ul58nh8a1cg9dg19p0u6@4ax.com> <cm3ad7lfcucbsfikar7r1i5psfgm7c74h2@4ax.com> <tjnad7h5ku4ag7lh1hn2uq123g1vg2004i@4ax.com>
X-Newsreader: Forte Agent 2.0/32.652
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Lines: 44
X-Usenet-Provider: http://www.giganews.com
X-Trace: sv3-0cfscLqZFCp0F48dFBcVvCRmSjgnvZQLVYHLvMfecYAkZ6rSr5N84Avs9Hhu5shIRN/fkN2ZBDvhDg2!yEhRojaowTWm3doIpKx9p5xrZc4ZkadgIaPGU3pUho0/OzyAgRDxX1+zUlEfHa/Nm6xgvwY=
X-Complaints-To: abuse@giganews.com
X-DMCA-Notifications: http://www.giganews.com/info/dmca.html
X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers
X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Otherwise we will be unable to process your complaint properly
X-Postfilter: 1.3.40
X-Original-Bytes: 2697
Xref: news.nzbot.com alt.binaries.pictures.webeweb:2043
On Tue, 29 Nov 2011 16:37:33 -0600, Stringtheory <not@big.bang> wrote:
>On Tue, 29 Nov 2011 12:04:21 -0500, Naboo <Naboo@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
>>
>>>http://sandi.webegirls.biz/index.html
>>>
>>>I thought there was a problem with these sets of images?????
>>>
>>>Anyone with more knowledge or experience with dealing with online
>>>sites care to give an opinion??
>>>
>>>I don't know, I am just asking!
>>>
>>
>>
>>Dont join that.
>>You can find everything Sandi right here if you have enough retention
>>with your newsgroup provider. If not, im certain someone with the
>>entire Sandi collection would be williing to post what you need.
>>That website is not the orignial owners of Sandis pictures. More than
>>likely siimply set up by someone looking to make a quick buck. He
>>collected the pictures-probably from here and is reselling them.
>>Sandi, nor would any model make a dime off of the sell of those
>>pictures through that website.
>>
>> If you do join it you might not even receive anything-it might be a
>>dead end. They charge your credit card and give you nothing. What can
>>you do then, where would you turn?
>>
>>
>>
>>
>I have a lot of Sandi sets.
There were a couple of sets I would like to see, but I don't know the
numbers. I have been lurking here a good while and I can't really
remember that last post of her. Most of the postings here are crap,
but it is like going fishing... ya never know when your going to
catch a good one!!
|
|
|