muckrat <muckrat@modelworship.com> wrote in news:Xns9CA17E6C931C7ratTR17@
198.186.190.162:
> Poster, you are a priceless gem!
> I thank you so much for coming through with even a part of my request!
>
> One small thing, though.
> Why do the images look damaged on the bottom?
>
> It turns out that I have the exact same problem with the set 52 that I
> have. I was hoping that someone had an undamaged version.
>
> Still, I'm ecstatic that SOMEBODY was willing to help me out!
>
> -rat-
>
Actually looking at the placement of the watermark, which appears to be
intact, I'm beginning to believe that the original photos were actually
published with the "shifted bottom" defect. How utterly unfortunate!
-rat-
|
|
![Favorite](javascript:myfavor('http://nzbot.com/article/alt.binaries.pictures.webeweb/1124', 'Re: BB #52 4 rat - sorry no #65 [ 01 of 60 ] "m120-s02-01.jpg" yEnc (1/1)')){kind=link}