On Tue, 29 Sep 2009 19:33:31 +0000, NottyBrother wrote:
> On 29-Sep-2009, jorj <jorj@hea.ven> wrote:
>
>> Dude you're being an idiot.
>
> Thank you.
>
>> A) I never said you could remove the watermark. I said it was possible
>> to get around the watermarking. If you want to know how, jsut ask - I
>> did it dozens of times.
>
> ohhh.....
>
>> B) No, "most pictures" were not modified in some mysterious way. ALL
>> pictures were watermarked. ALL. Unless you knew how to get around the
>> process. Which I did. The ones that were not watermarked still have the
>> jpeg text fields in them - all the rest, that were watermarked, will
>> have ABCDEFGHIJKLMNOPQRS....0123456789abcdef.... and so forth through
>> this part of the file.
>
> Yeah... and you call that watermarking a picture? Yes I am an idiot, for
> trying to teach you something...
No, you're an idiot because you THINK you know something you don't and
then refuse to listen when someone who DOES know what they are talking
about wastes his time trying to edumucate you.
So I guess that makes me an idiot too. Just this once, anyway.
> I won't tell you how I know pictures were not watermarked.. it is
> obvious!
Yes, You're truly an idiot. No, now you've become a fucking idiot...
|
|