FALA <FarAway@ndLongAgo.com> wrote in
news:d8pnralbl6usc6usiag2bbsv55sc83i9lp@4ax.com:
> On 31 Jul 2015 20:20:34 GMT, Weener <rs@wagner.com> wrote:
>
>>"Lucky" <LuckyLou@Lizardlick.Hotbush> wrote in
>>news:btednTWPA6jizibInZ2dnUU7-SudnZ2d@giganews.com:
>>
>>> It's the only set I'm missing from y076.
>>>
>>
>>Hi Lucky, I pretty sure it's y188-012. In my csv y076 only goes to set
>>067. Those extra three sets 68-70 on the index with no pic counts,
>>didn't get released as y076 during the epic anon posts, as far as I
>>know. They could have been released as both on the site, I don't know,
>>but were released as y188 here.
>>
>>Weener
>
> I think Epic Anon only goes to set 62 anyway, this was end 2008-early
> 2009, unless there was another batch.
> Were these uploads a good thing? Without them most of us would only
> have a fraction of stuff but maybe the site would still exist. Though
> by the end it was just a classy soft porn site IMO. (Ouch!)
>
I thought it was a good thing at the time, but now I wish the site would
have kept going. There would most likely be nude y157 sets for sale by now.
LOL Weener
|
|