On Fri, 21 Dec 2018 18:10:55 -0600, retrowavelength
<retrowavelength@yahoo.com> wrote:
>> retrowavelength <retrowavelength@yahoo.com> wrote in
>> news:nN2dnXdz17gbJ4vBnZ2dnUU7-fGdnZ2d@giganews.com:
>>
>>>>
>>>> begin 644 H44.jpg
>>>>
>>>> Attachment decoded: H44.jpg
>>>> `
>>>> end
>>>>
>>>
>>> Model also seen in 45-96, C-405, C-414, C-415, P67, P77, R461, R462,
>>> R-476, X-16, XXJ-14, XXJ-23.
>>> There's one photo with the name Ann. Does that connect with a last
>>> name for anyone? My archives had a claim for the name Dolly Miller
>>> but I doubt it.
>>>
>>> --rwl
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> ---
>>> This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
>>> https://www.avast.com/antivirus
>>> begin 644 C-405 match Ann x16246.jpg
>>>
>>> Attachment decoded: C-405 match Ann x16246.jpg
>>> `
>>> end
>>>
>>>
>>
>> Thanks for the information. I looked at MyArchives and it seems the ID
>> is based on this "She was identifed as Dolly Miller in the August 1952
>> issue of EYEFUL, page 15, with the added description: "This blonde honey
>> stands exactly 5' 8 1/2" and tips the scales at a nice round 132
>> pounds. Like her?""
>>
>> I don't have access to that mag so I can' comment further.
>>
>> HM
>>
>
>Thanks for that info, that may lead to discovering the magazine pages
>sometime soon. That they cited a source says a LOT about the probable
>reliability of the claim.
>
>--rwl
Here's the only reference I could find to Dolly Miller. Looks like
she was still growing.
|
|