alt.binaries.pictures.erotica.vintagePrev. Next
Re: Jackie Park(s) - 3 attachments
retrowavelength (retrowavelength@yahoo.com) 2018/08/24 14:19

Path: news.nzbot.com!not-for-mail
NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 24 Aug 2018 15:19:59 -0500
Newsgroups: alt.binaries.pictures.erotica.vintage
Subject: Re: Jackie Park(s) - 3 attachments
From: retrowavelength <retrowavelength@yahoo.com>
References: <3lkondds0rbhhu7rj4vhk8qqkh43i1abts@4ax.com> <zNCdnTqTbZkkO-DGnZ2dnUU7-YmdnZ2d@giganews.com> <qr8tnddf8bb51mjaec8rk6g59j3e7ofdes@4ax.com>
User-Agent: Xnews/5.04.25
Message-ID: <Y72dnabHZ6Ty9R3GnZ2dnUU7-SOdnZ2d@giganews.com>
Date: Fri, 24 Aug 2018 15:19:59 -0500
Lines: 34
X-Usenet-Provider: http://www.giganews.com
X-Trace: sv3-6QO+SJT2nAVJ3QWdqeQf/GxlkDo0m3Laqe6lG9gRlZoOMYBeKjh1bN3q1qOIJ1uRw63M13nLMlFxjui!8TkWLpacS5Xn9QB/oGI9Z79c14w1WDzLne3/S4iiBdFQqRsB3PSlHD2GKyXtpLWWhyYliZNjznBV
X-Complaints-To: abuse@giganews.com
X-DMCA-Notifications: http://www.giganews.com/info/dmca.html
X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers
X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Otherwise we will be unable to process your complaint properly
X-Postfilter: 1.3.40
X-Original-Bytes: 2450
X-Received-Bytes: 2572
X-Received-Body-CRC: 1477510872
Xref: news.nzbot.com alt.binaries.pictures.erotica.vintage:15893

> On Wed, 22 Aug 2018 13:08:57 -0500, retrowavelength
> <retrowavelength@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
>>> Was it your opinion, rwl, that Jackie Park and Jackie Parks
>>> are the same model?  They look the same to me.
>>>
>>> Sorry about a new thread, but I find it difficult to track
>>> or reply to your 'names' posts.
>>
>>Hi!  Well, I didn't mean to suggest they were the same in that post,
>>they just appeared next to each other in the files listing. But now
>>that you mention it, I agree that they do appear to be the same model.
>>The images look a lot alike. I think I will tag those as AKA names.
>
> Yep, me too.  I had that parks_sparks file tagged Park before
> because I assumed the s was just rhyming nonsense, but I think
> it's backed up by your frolic file.
>
>>Is there something in particular that makes the names-posts hard to
>>follow? Something I should consider doing differently?
>
> The way I download doesn't mesh well with a long list of posts
> that all have exactly the same subject line.  I can't find any
> particular message, later.  But that's just me.
>
> RR
>

Hi, RR.  Y'know, I have also had a similar difficulty matching the right
message with later comments on it.  I should see if there's a simple way to
discriminate them without slowing the posting process a lot (I don't use a
posting application).

--rwl

Follow-ups:123456
Next Prev. Article List         Favorite