Xref: news.nzbot.com alt.binaries.pictures.earlmiller:10987
Path: news.nzbot.com!peer01.ams1!peer.ams1.xlned.com!news.xlned.com!peer01.am4!peer.am4.highwinds-media.com!peer01.iad!feed-me.highwinds-media.com!news.highwinds-media.com!post01.iad!fx04.iad.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: SL <SerpentLord@Evil.Incarn8>
Newsgroups: alt.binaries.pictures.earlmiller
Subject: Re: femjoy_Josephine - Pure Beauty_000.jpg [01/52] - yEnc (1/1)
Message-ID: <mf2l9e52lbmhqnoo6n2hntnv36ad0hk1mt@4ax.com>
References: <q754k2822jd@news3.newsguy.com> <eadi9ehpfcge1pltqdn92s4k6ikenrpohp@4ax.com> <4cfi9ed0dla00ocvjknuhb9pc51vffv2j6@4ax.com> <h0tj9e1gvuhtm8fvnr7hcb09unchpngru9@4ax.com>
User-Agent: ForteAgent/7.20.32.1218
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Lines: 37
X-Complaints-To: http://abuse.usenetxs.com
NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 26 Mar 2019 20:29:42 UTC
Date: Tue, 26 Mar 2019 15:29:29 -0500
X-Received-Bytes: 2452
X-Received-Body-CRC: 1724375709
On Tue, 26 Mar 2019 05:46:00 -0400, Buck <Buck@Scanners.Inc> wrote:
>On Mon, 25 Mar 2019 15:48:57 -0500, SL <SerpentLord@Evil.Incarn8>
>posted: "Re: femjoy_Josephine - Pure Beauty_000.jpg [01/52] - yEnc
>(1/1)"
>
>>On Mon, 25 Mar 2019 15:09:40 -0500, SL <SerpentLord@Evil.Incarn8>
>>wrote:
>>
>>>On 23 Mar 2019 11:17:22 GMT, Buck@Scanners.Inc (Buck) wrote:
>>>
>>> The latest set I've seen of Josephine - she changed her look
>>>again. She had short hair.
>>
>> (adding on here)
>> I always thought Josephine missed her calling...maybe what
>>she's doing pays better...idk, but I think she would have made a good
>>glamour model. I'm not talking about my definition, as such, but as a
>>Cover Girl or Revlon model, etc.
>> She has the "look" and it would have been more respectable for
>>her. Just sayin'...not wishing her away or anything.
>> Can you see that? Her putting on lipstick vs. checking your
>>dipstick. LOQ
>
>You could be right.
>
>The other day I was watching TV, which I rarely do, during an
>advertisement I thought the quick shot of a model was that of Violla.
>Mostly just my wishful thinking.
Actually being a pornstar doesn't limit your career
possibilities anymore. Just look at Kim Kardashian...tell me she's
not a pornstar! And lately, all the Trump-haters have put Stormy
Daniels on pedestal. She's a slut, a whore. You can't just wish away
pure definitions.
Sheesh! What is this world coming to? We've even got Pammie
Lee doing porn now! I'm honestly ashamed FOR her. :-|
|
|
')){kind=link}