alt.binaries.pictures.aviationPrev. Next
Re: Planes n' Cranes 11 - Recovered Recon.jpg (1/1) Negdje
Netko (Someone.not@this.address) 2015/01/03 20:38

Path: news.nzbot.com!not-for-mail
NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 03 Jan 2015 21:38:23 -0600
Date: Sun, 4 Jan 2015 03:38:24 +0000
From: Netko <Someone.not@this.address>
Organization: Negdje
MIME-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Hogwasher/4.3
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-15
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Message-ID: <0001HW.D0CE662F0029603DB02919BF@news-europe.giganews.com>
Subject: Re: Planes n' Cranes 11 - Recovered Recon.jpg (1/1)
Newsgroups: alt.binaries.pictures.aviation
References: <0001HW.D0CCE1E20024F64CB03139BF@news-europe.giganews.com> <2015010216575555439-savageduck1@REMOVESPAMmecom>
Lines: 24
X-Usenet-Provider: http://www.giganews.com
X-Trace: sv3-SJY09Hceg1BSZdLWzTh5teBvx49QX8tLeZ/DTsdrEqeLgpLblCXwsQdTL+NFqQ3uh++MR5WmkyCvlf7!3xRHC+vrF65AbLQgUmjqTxClxAsq9XLaRRFBnNV6K/KlZ/n4fTjT7XNpXpH3KhWniPqcevaP2V/5!gylvg9ye0AvDDw==
X-Complaints-To: abuse@giganews.com
X-DMCA-Notifications: http://www.giganews.com/info/dmca.html
X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers
X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Otherwise we will be unable to process your complaint properly
X-Postfilter: 1.3.40
X-Original-Bytes: 2174
X-Received-Body-CRC: 1964360724
X-Received-Bytes: 2452
Xref: news.nzbot.com alt.binaries.pictures.aviation:702

On Sat, 3 Jan 2015 00:57:55 +0000, Savageduck wrote
(in article <2015010216575555439-savageduck1@REMOVESPAMmecom>):

>> There are a couple of things about this aircraft which make me think it is a
>> Short 166.  Can anyone confirm this (or mock my ignorance)?
>
> Google is your friend, and your intuition comes through as correct.

Actually I had done a search but Short's 'folder' seaplanes all look much the
same to me. I reckoned it was a 166 for two reasons:

(1) the national marking is a Union flag rather than a roundel, making it, I


(2) the fragment of the serial showing in the photo which Mitchell posted
looks like it could include a '6' followed by a '4' and No 164 was a 166.

However, none of that is conclusive, hence my question.

As a footnote, I was surprised to see that some UK aircraft apparently used
the flag as the national marking as late as 1916; I thought that had changed
by late 1914/early 1915.



Follow-ups:1234
Next Prev. Article List         Favorite