alt.binaries.pictures.aviationPrev. Next
Re: Fi 103R Flying Heritage Collection - FieselerFi103-Reichenberg-1.jpg Negdje
Netko (Someone.not@this.address) 2016/06/12 12:34

Path: news.nzbot.com!news.astraweb.com!border6.newsrouter.astraweb.com!newspeer1.nac.net!goblin1!goblin.stu.neva.ru!border1.nntp.ams1.giganews.com!border2.nntp.ams1.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!buffer2.nntp.ams1.giganews.com!news.giganews.com.POSTED!not-for-mail
NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 12 Jun 2016 13:34:39 -0500
Date: Sun, 12 Jun 2016 19:34:38 +0100
From: Netko <Someone.not@this.address>
Organization: Negdje
MIME-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Hogwasher/4.3
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-ID: <0001HW.D38369CE0010BBB4B03959BF@news-europe.giganews.com>
Subject: Re: Fi 103R Flying Heritage Collection - FieselerFi103-Reichenberg-1.jpg
Newsgroups: alt.binaries.pictures.aviation
References: <rupnlb9k5ck69b88ng83uornlja7jd5ism@4ax.com> <j69olbdg77vm2avhvu049tegelf8qv8un0@4ax.com> <njh9p50usa@drn.newsguy.com> <0001HW.D381F0760009C291B03139BF@news-europe.giganews.com> <t30qlbpgo71b3rstlqvqq1pb9s91gop8p6@4ax.com>
Lines: 16
X-Usenet-Provider: http://www.giganews.com
X-Trace: sv3-sLodR0+xSIJL3qWr7882dyabXzr2uVjF3Kg9AylsmxMPxQDuUz3hz0/LCzxubHTadB+53DvTT3efhYE!6+S8Typ/g2Ss/Jv44kT8/kVUu8gbT1rkZ31NXigJ9+wYa4e/nxNPu6ftYHeMn5qpA8mGNJDaTLao!iEFY0XduJh0A
X-Complaints-To: abuse@giganews.com
X-DMCA-Notifications: http://www.giganews.com/info/dmca.html
X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers
X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Otherwise we will be unable to process your complaint properly
X-Postfilter: 1.3.40
X-Original-Bytes: 1982
Xref: news.nzbot.com alt.binaries.pictures.aviation:3799

On Sun, 12 Jun 2016 07:28:36 +0100, Bob (not my real pseudonym) wrote
(in article <t30qlbpgo71b3rstlqvqq1pb9s91gop8p6@4ax.com>):

> Looks like a late model Ju-88.  And I think the 'Condor' is actually
> an He 177...?

Everybody seems to be giving me Greif today but, mea culpa, you're correct,
it's not a Condor.  But tua culpa also as it's not an He 177 either.  I now
think it's a Ju 352.

Oh, and I also reckon that's a Ju 188 rather than an 88.

I say all this not because my recognition of parts of aircraft has suddenly
improved but rather because I've come across a photograph which shows this
aircraft line-up in context.  I'll post it shortly.


Follow-ups:1234
Next Prev. Article List         Favorite