Path: news.nzbot.com!not-for-mail
From: frank@thehowards.ca
Newsgroups: alt.binaries.pictures.aviation
Subject: Re: UK2 WT333 EE CanberraB(I)8 2013-05-26 to G-BVXC Bruntingthorpe RobbertSnijdersPhoto.jpg - wt333.jpg (0/1)
Message-ID: <p7a58bhjdjauuk9o9h3bqav7ndvkr1u570@4ax.com>
References: <cr458bphm6f54hkne6fg3pmmfanl44a2g3@4ax.com> <vo958bdn1f3k9kilh16ditov55rh8boopb@4ax.com>
User-Agent: ForteAgent/8.00.32.1272
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Lines: 16
NNTP-Posting-Host: 67.193.84.230
X-Complaints-To: abuse@cogeco.net
X-Trace: 1451403974 67.193.84.230 (Tue, 29 Dec 2015 15:46:14 UTC)
NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 29 Dec 2015 15:46:14 UTC
Date: Tue, 29 Dec 2015 10:46:03 -0500
X-Received-Body-CRC: 996238976
X-Received-Bytes: 1532
Xref: news.nzbot.com alt.binaries.pictures.aviation:2894
On Tue, 29 Dec 2015 10:33:54 -0500, frank@thehowards.ca wrote:
>On Tue, 29 Dec 2015 09:53:10 -0500, Joseph Testagrose
><Joet5@optonline.net> wrote:
>
>ukserials.com lists WT333 as a modified B6 with the original cockpit
>canopy.
>
>Frank.
Well the mystery deepens. WT333 falls in a group of many B(I)8. Then
there is this picture which surely has the B(I)8 canopy So perhaps it
started life as a B(I)8 and was modified to B6 standards. Is this a
possibility? On ukserials.com, I assumed that that the "modified"
comment refered to non-stendard nose.
Frank.
|
|
8 2013-05-26 to G-BVXC Bruntingthorpe RobbertSnijdersPhoto.jpg - wt333.jpg (0/1)')){kind=link}