Path: news.nzbot.com!not-for-mail
NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 15 Aug 2015 11:53:07 -0500
Subject: Re: Seldom-seen WWII pix
Newsgroups: alt.binaries.pictures.aviation
References: <dLOdnTm3dMJtwVjInZ2dnUU7-SUAAAAA@earthlink.com>
<1pmdnTM0ffhQeVjInZ2dnUU7-KednZ2d@giganews.com>
<vcvbsahp93vng455j4fpp6ksisfdae88ru@4ax.com>
<cvndsaprlgcvabjhb3bv94rar7fj4o96p9@4ax.com>
<jalesa56egc23gvc7eftktef43maogbp62@4ax.com>
<VZGdna15MvAO1lLInZ2dnUU7-X-dnZ2d@giganews.com>
<blnusa5v3hii2n9i45n6cjm9c3i6jk3i8p@4ax.com>
From: =?UTF-8?Q?Ri=c2=a9ardo?= <here@glorious-somerset.uk>
Date: Sat, 15 Aug 2015 17:53:07 +0100
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101
Thunderbird/38.0.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <blnusa5v3hii2n9i45n6cjm9c3i6jk3i8p@4ax.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Message-ID: <uZ6dnZ_qKPnp81LInZ2dnUU7-TGdnZ2d@giganews.com>
Lines: 85
X-Usenet-Provider: http://www.giganews.com
X-Trace: sv3-bKkqFBa2mQMKLhA7xrbebOaOCAv5plTVgZr5G7g3KWOFOlTtqQuBYW+AcTF8Ao+5J1hpRGCZ8vbpBxY!BxSpBqB5m8q8rwymYTJe0rgx7YuK/dOlcSj2Q9PBWaxdD4v+RyjdeT7E/O4A623U7cXfMWFp7w==
X-Complaints-To: abuse@giganews.com
X-DMCA-Notifications: http://www.giganews.com/info/dmca.html
X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers
X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Otherwise we will be unable to process your complaint properly
X-Postfilter: 1.3.40
X-Original-Bytes: 5180
X-Received-Body-CRC: 97689526
X-Received-Bytes: 5431
Xref: news.nzbot.com alt.binaries.pictures.aviation:2292
On 8/15/2015 4:50 PM, Charles Lindbergh wrote:
>
>> On 8/9/2015 2:28 PM, Charles Lindbergh wrote:
>>> On Sat, 08 Aug 2015 22:07:28 -0700, "Bob (not my real pseudonym)"
>>> <invalid@invalid.invalid> wrote:
>>>
>>>> On Sat, 08 Aug 2015 13:04:52 +0000, Charles Lindbergh
>>>> <spirit@stlouis.invalid> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>> On 8/8/2015 2:35 AM, Byker wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Fairey Swordfish - A remarkable aircraft:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> "Although Swordfish numbered no more than 27 aircraft, they sank an
>>>>>> average 50,000 tons (50,800 MT) of shipping every month. During one
>>>>>> month, they sank a record 98,000 tons (99,572 MT). Swordfish attacked
>>>>>> enemy convoys at night although they were not equipped with night
>>>>>> instrumentation. The risky night missions were necessary to avoid German
>>>>>> fighters which encircled the island of Malta by day. On June 30, 1940,
>>>>>> Swordfish completed a raid attacking oil installations at Augusta in
>>>>>> Sicily."
>>>>>>
>>>>>> http://www.aviation-history.com/fairey/swordfish.html
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Ricardo, I read the article you posted. I was shocked the Swordfish holds the record for sinking more tonnage
>>>>> than any other allied aircraft during WWII.
>>>>>
>>>>> I am guessing this had a lot to do with circumstance as opposed to any remarkable capabilities of the
>>>>> aircraft, what is your perspective on this?
>>>>
>>>> I would suggest the remarkable capabilities of the crews.
>>>
>>> Yeah, I'm sure that's it! ;-)
>>>
>>
>> There's interesting comment today by way of a letter to one of our
>> national newspapers where the Swordfish gets a mention, as does the
>> Pacific War of which little is heard about the substantial British
>> contribution:
>>
>> "Sir,
>>
>> The "Forgotten Fleet" and its aircraft will be remembered today when a
>> vintage Royal Navy Swordfish biplane leads the fly-past over Horse
>> Guards Parade in London as part of events to commemorate the 70th
>> anniversary of VJ Day.
>>
>> The British Pacific Fleet was the largest strike force ever assembled by
>> the Royal Navy*** and it fought alongside the US Navy in 1945. Aircraft
>> of the Fleet Air Arm undertook the largest ever raid in aviation naval
>> history on the oil fields at Palembang in Sumatra, and British naval
>> aircraft carried out raids upon Japan itself.
>>
>> It's most appropriate that a Swordfish, which saw action in every year
>> of the war, will represent not just the forgotten fleet but the
>> oft-forgotten Fleet Air Arm too.
>>
>> We should all take a moment today to remember those who fought the
>> Japanese Empire. Most who survive are nearly 90 years old or more. They
>> deserve our salute.
>>
>> Lt-Cdr Lester May RN (retd)
>>
>> *** To put that into context, Britain provided three-quarters of the
>> warships and landing craft for the D-Day landings in Europe!
>>
>
> Interesting article and comments. Is your point that the Brits contributed significantly to the war against
> Japan? It would be logical for them to have done so considering the Japanese, on 8 December 1941(local time,
> which was before the Japanese attack on Pearl Harbor), attacked the British in Malaya.
>
> Did I miss your point?
>
In a word, no. But I was also highlighting how large the size of British
Pacific Fleet strike force must have been in 1945 when one considers the
British contribution to the D-Day landings.
--
Moving Things In Still Pictures
|
| Follow-ups: | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 | 20 | 21 | 22 | 23 | 24 | 25 | 26 | 27 |
|