alt.binaries.pictures.aviationPrev. Next
Re: Bristol 188
Byker (byker@do~rag.net) 2015/08/05 16:16

Path: news.nzbot.com!not-for-mail
NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 05 Aug 2015 17:16:25 -0500
From: "Byker" <byker@do~rag.net>
Newsgroups: alt.binaries.pictures.aviation
References: <gfudnZHg8KVIxl_InZ2dnUU7-L2dnZ2d@earthlink.com> <VMSdnYVXktaf9l_InZ2dnUU7-UOdnZ2d@giganews.com> <f7r4sadfej7ia0jvbich9rmu0djf199uqp@4ax.com>
In-Reply-To: <f7r4sadfej7ia0jvbich9rmu0djf199uqp@4ax.com>
Subject: Re: Bristol 188
Date: Wed, 5 Aug 2015 17:16:29 -0500
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
 format=flowed;
 charset="UTF-8";
 reply-type=original
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
Importance: Normal
X-Newsreader: Microsoft Windows Live Mail 16.4.3528.331
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V16.4.3528.331
X-Antivirus: avast! (VPS 150805-1, 08/05/2015), Outbound message
X-Antivirus-Status: Clean
Message-ID: <__ednQM8mrekFl_InZ2dnUU7-c-dnZ2d@earthlink.com>
Lines: 24
X-Usenet-Provider: http://www.giganews.com
NNTP-Posting-Host: 107.196.159.235
X-Trace: sv3-Z918WHiq3REBwZulZ7iUdDFF+JrojoZbdb2YkMidDixJah5q5c3WPF2E3w5tW/gF0oVvuhjCfeHtEH/!BdTGTihlyN30YnvzFBtRvxYFc/iMu0eq7ne2YQmq23MHv9gfOrKm5OxVY0ke9F5PxGIRe3ZFzA14!hKlitsw78F5lwbLVuIoRU3RSqwHIHIZtZAXO
X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers
X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Otherwise we will be unable to process your complaint properly
X-Postfilter: 1.3.40
X-Original-Bytes: 2322
X-Received-Body-CRC: 3996003645
X-Received-Bytes: 2575
Xref: news.nzbot.com alt.binaries.pictures.aviation:2189

"Charles Lindbergh"  wrote in message
news:f7r4sadfej7ia0jvbich9rmu0djf199uqp@4ax.com...
>
> Wasn't this puppy considered one of Britain's worst aeronautical
> engineering disasters?

In terms of money lost, I can think of

Bristol Brabazon: £12M (1949 costs) – £350M (2012 inflation adjusted cost)

SARO Princess: £10M (1952) for three aircraft
http://www.fzt.haw-hamburg.de/pers/Scholz/dglr/hh/text_2010_06_03_SR_Princess.pdf

R101 Airship: £711,595 (1930)

None of these entered airline service.

In a way, the DeHavilland Comet (1949) was an engineering failure, but it
bounced back from its explosive decompression problems and the Comet 4
series which debuted in 1958 had a productive career of over 30 years.

You also might want to check out:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:British_experimental_aircraft_1950%E2%80%931959


Follow-ups:12345678
Next Prev. Article List         Favorite