Path: news.nzbot.com!not-for-mail
From: Jess Lurkin <NiceGuy@happyness.com>
Newsgroups: alt.binaries.pictures.aviation
Subject: Re: Pentagon's vaunted F-35 earns lousy review from test pilot in secret report
Date: 4 Jul 2015 16:42:32 GMT
Organization: NewsGuy - Unlimited Usenet $23.95
Lines: 40
Message-ID: <mn92do02927@news3.newsguy.com>
References: <efndpalsmljlcn5igv8amg4fcvu7v1aabu@4ax.com> <avbfpategckldjl5j9km7ruu1q6kd0cn19@4ax.com>
NNTP-Posting-Host: p31e077b2665e69b9f52948b43b9f085ccaa81f28c102a6a7.newsdawg.com
User-Agent: Xnews/5.04.25
X-Received-Body-CRC: 3662483076
X-Received-Bytes: 2222
Xref: news.nzbot.com alt.binaries.pictures.aviation:1998
"Bob (not my real pseudonym)" <invalid@invalid.invalid> wrote in
news:avbfpategckldjl5j9km7ruu1q6kd0cn19@4ax.com:
> On Fri, 03 Jul 2015 19:11:29 +0000, Charles Lindbergh
> <spirit@stlouis.invalid> wrote:
>
>>Not a big surprise.... but still disappointing.
>>
>>Pentagon's vaunted F-35 earns lousy review from test pilot in secret
>>report
>>
>>http://fxn.ws/1FYt9Nd
>>
>>original story here:
>>
>>https://medium.com/war-is-boring/when-is-the-f-35-not-a-dogfighter-when-i
>>t-s-convenient-2fb1f233f42
>
> clearly of a bygone era,' Air Force Lt. Col. Pete Zuppas, then in
> charge of the 35th Operations Group in Japan, wrote in an official
> 2007 op-ed."
>
> They said that about the F-4 Phantom - until Viet Nam came along. At
> least the F-35 has a gun...
> ------------------------------------------
> ------------------------------------------
> What we need are more A-10s - cheap, indestructible, beautifully
> ugly and capable of ruining Achmed's day with both engines tied
> behind its back.
> ------------------------------------------
> ------------------------------------------
Hear! Hear! This was obviously spoken by a light bird who had no
idea how the soon-to-be politically correct bammy military would
regard the Warthog. They all toe that idiot's "red-line" now.
Save the U.S.! ANYBODY other than ANY dimoRAT in 2016!
Thanks for posting the quote, Bob.
|
|