alt.binaries.pictures.aviationPrev. Next
Re: Budapest - An Incredible Air Show Easynews - www.easynews. ..
Charles Lindbergh (spirit@stlouis.com) 2015/06/11 06:23

Path: news.nzbot.com!not-for-mail
From: Charles Lindbergh <spirit@stlouis.com>
Newsgroups: alt.binaries.pictures.aviation
Subject: Re: Budapest - An Incredible Air Show
Message-ID: <75vinatejk6m7qo28shb5osk07c5e1vt0c@4ax.com>
References: <7OKdnQJR0dbnW-vInZ2dnUU7-RednZ2d@giganews.com> <lmrfna9phv2hq5gs0ougug7f5h9ufdppu1@4ax.com> <b28gnal6e7sgb7ou2bkme8undnjno9b4v8@4ax.com> <cr7inahu7uvc384p5hefbthm5te9skj5o1@4ax.com>
User-Agent: ForteAgent/7.00.32.1200
X-No-Archive: yes
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Lines: 30
X-Complaints-To: abuse@easynews.com
Organization: Easynews - www.easynews.com
X-Complaints-Info: Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers otherwise we will be unable to process your complaint properly.
Date: Thu, 11 Jun 2015 05:23:46 -0700
X-Received-Body-CRC: 2913215585
X-Received-Bytes: 2141
Xref: news.nzbot.com alt.binaries.pictures.aviation:1928

On Wed, 10 Jun 2015 22:43:45 -0700, "Bob (not my real pseudonym)"
<invalid@invalid.invalid> wrote:

>On Wed, 10 Jun 2015 12:32:59 +0100, JR <jr@somewhere.cox> wrote:
>
>>On Wed, 10 Jun 2015 01:02:25 -0700, "Bob (not my real pseudonym)"
>><invalid@invalid.invalid> wrote:
>>

>>><here@glorious-somerset.uk> wrote:
>>>
>>>>Enjoy:
>>>>
>>>>https://www.youtube.com/embed/0px9HFIVYjY?feature=player_embedded
>>>>

>>>
>>>For an outfit that sells canned bat piss, Red Bull has an impressive
>>>"air force".
>>
>>Their lineup of old warplanes is stagering. Bet there are quite a few
>>museums drooling...
>
>I'm a bit of a historical accuracy nut - and happy to tell other folks
>how to spend their money - but I wish Red Bull would tone down the
>company logo on the warbirds.  The Sea Vixen repaint was a travesty.

Red Bull claims them as a business expense, advertising and marketing
to be exact.  The logos are so prominent simply because, if they were
not, the IRS would look unfavorably upon such fanciful accounting.

Follow-ups:12345678910
Next Prev. Article List         Favorite