alt.binaries.pictures.aviationPrev. Next
Re: UK2 XN342 Blackburn BuccaneerS1.jpg
Ramsman (nospam@nowhere.com) 2014/06/06 06:20

Path: news.nzbot.com!not-for-mail
From: Ramsman <nospam@nowhere.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.5.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
Newsgroups: alt.binaries.pictures.aviation
Subject: Re: UK2 XN342 Blackburn BuccaneerS1.jpg
References: <4jvto9p2qt5g9g3v7u1h29e24iv4n87brg@4ax.com> <0001HW.CFB4D98D0002319FB03139BF@news-europe.giganews.com> <2hFjv.117970$i%1.31500@fx23.fr7> <0001HW.CFB53DAC00033CFFB01029BF@news-europe.giganews.com>
In-Reply-To: <0001HW.CFB53DAC00033CFFB01029BF@news-europe.giganews.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Lines: 49
Message-ID: <_likv.88755$mY.62676@fx32.fr7>
NNTP-Posting-Host: 62.49.1.131
X-Complaints-To: abuse@demon.net
X-Trace: 1402057210 62.49.1.131 (Fri, 06 Jun 2014 12:20:10 UTC)
NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 06 Jun 2014 12:20:10 UTC
Date: Fri, 06 Jun 2014 13:20:10 +0100
X-Received-Body-CRC: 90542219
X-Received-Bytes: 2649
Xref: news.nzbot.com alt.binaries.pictures.aviation:148

On 04/06/2014 21:18, Netko wrote:
> On Wed, 4 Jun 2014 14:35:58 +0100, Ramsman wrote
> (in article <2hFjv.117970$i%1.31500@fx23.fr7>):
>
>> On 04/06/2014 14:11, Netko wrote:
>>> On Wed, 4 Jun 2014 13:09:21 +0100, Joseph Testagrose wrote
>>> (in article <4jvto9p2qt5g9g3v7u1h29e24iv4n87brg@4ax.com>):
>>>
>>> Something wrong here.
>>>
>>> The Mk1 Buccaneer had dinky little intakes for its dinky little engines -
>>> these look like the man-sized intakes of a Spey.
>>>
>>> And XN342 is listed as Skeeter.
>>>
>>
>> That's just what I thought: "Those aren't Mk.1 intakes".
>>
>> As for the serial, try XV342:
>> http://www.blackburn-buccaneer.co.uk/S2_XV342_files/S2_XV342.html
>>
>> Based on the history on that page, the caption in the original post must
>> refer to a different drawing.
>
> Plausible but I'm still puzzled.  The history of XV342 on the page you cite
> puts it at Lossiemouth for its entire RN career, with no record of it having
> served aboard Ark Royal as the illustration depicts.
>

800 NAS was based at Lossiemouth, but served aboard Ark Royal with its
Buccaneers.

> Also, were any Mk2s painted in that anti-flash colour scheme?  I didn't think
> so but I could well be wrong.
>
Possibly, but I haven't found any photos or decal sheets with all-white
Mk.2s. I've only found grey FAA aircraft.

>> Considering the vast quantity of good posts from Joseph, I think the odd
>> typo can be forgiven.
>
> I agree and I'm happy to make it clear that I didn't intend any criticism of
> the estimable Mr Testagrose.
>
>


--
Peter

Follow-ups:12345
Next Prev. Article List         Favorite