Path: news.nzbot.com!not-for-mail
Newsgroups: alt.binaries.newstar
Subject: Re: Sweet Sharona Set 060 - Thanks To OP 68 files - "sharona-060-073.jpg" yEnc (1/1)
From: BlackWind <whoknows@yohomail.com>
References: <akL3v.7700$sa2.6612@fx33.am4> <riakm9tjk7gm77ndgt3oingk3j2qp85n8k@4ax.com> <XnsA3266F5125E68zupnowhere@74.209.131.13>
Organization: Your Company
Message-ID: <XnsA326A568720D3meanonmailcom@216.151.153.44>
User-Agent: Xnews/5.04.25
X-Antivirus: avast! (VPS 140507-1, 05/07/2014), Outbound message
X-Antivirus-Status: Clean
Date: 07 May 2014 23:15:30 GMT
Lines: 22
NNTP-Posting-Host: 36fbe579.news.astraweb.com
X-Trace: DXC=\\B<`9dTk:T1IA2mQNenURL?0kYOcDh@ZDc?0<1MH?2YiG8i?S9JJ<U[FRU;cOC9IWWaE0:9XbUSX8A<P@miB_]WcDFQ\JL6DhZShJ:I=Jc]=X
X-Received-Body-CRC: 111401492
X-Received-Bytes: 2035
Xref: news.nzbot.com alt.binaries.newstar:130
zup <zup@nowhere> wrote in news:XnsA3266F5125E68zupnowhere@74.209.131.13:
> Borg <Borg@Borg.com> wrote in news:
>
>> Looks like this is the final set of 'this' Sharona. Site begins using
>> a different model, but still using the name Sharona, beginning with
>> Set 61. And, believe you me, nothing AT ALL like the original Sharona.
>> No need to post the new one, IMHO. (I don't usually make a point of
>> criticizing models, individual taste being what it is, but I find the
>> new Sharona just this side of creepy.)
>
> I don't like her either or understand why they got rid of the original
> Sharona whom I rather thought was one of the better models they had.
>
She does nothing for me either. Maybe the old Sharona was starting to
object to the bare butt outfits (or who knows...maybe they wanted some
"special" sets to sell and she's not into that)
---
This email is free from viruses and malware because avast! Antivirus protection is active.
http://www.avast.com
|
|
![Favorite](javascript:myfavor('http://nzbot.com/article/alt.binaries.newstar/130h', 'Re: Sweet Sharona Set 060 - Thanks To OP 68 files - "sharona-060-073.jpg" yEnc (1/1)')){kind=link}