Path: news.nzbot.com!not-for-mail
From: here@the.net (Par Yer Rars)
Newsgroups: alt.binaries.multimedia.vintage-film.post-1960
Subject: Re: Spring.Night.Summer.Night.1967.720p.WebDL.x264 "Spring.Night.Summer.Night.1967.720p.nfo" (1/1)
Message-ID: <f55hudha7p2uk1hhpom1h2jn8suj5lmldu@4ax.com>
References: <tyJFD.284400$031.16245@fx15.ams1> <rY_FD.296275$031.24701@fx15.ams1> <k22hud9mov7uvkat69uo6ofs45nkjnmpgr@4ax.com>
X-Newsreader: Forte Agent 3.3/32.846
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Lines: 23
X-Complaints-To: abuse@tweaknews.nl
NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 11 Nov 2018 20:46:29 UTC
Organization: Tweaknews
Date: Sun, 11 Nov 2018 12:45:51 -0800
X-Received-Bytes: 1965
X-Received-Body-CRC: 3374876021
Xref: news.nzbot.com alt.binaries.multimedia.vintage-film.post-1960:4780
On Sun, 11 Nov 2018 11:59:46 -0800, here@the.net (Par Yer Rars) wrote:
>On Sun, 11 Nov 2018 18:57:27 GMT, fred <fred@fred.fred> wrote:
>
>>On Sat, 10 Nov 2018 23:09:13 GMT, here@the.net (Par Yer Rars) wrote
>>
>>> Width : 1 280 pixels
>>> Height : 768 pixels
>>> Display aspect ratio : 1.667
>>>
>>
>>For 720p, encode should be 1200x720 ?
>>or have I misunderstood ?
>A typcial 720p with AR of 1.667 would be 1200x720 as you say.
>As long as the Width of a 720p does not exceed 1280 then it
>still falls into the "720p" category AFAIK.
>https://hometheaterreview.com/720p-video/
>Some of the WebDL seem to be of an odd width/height lately
>I saw a 1080p WebDL with 1920x1152 pixels which conforms
>to Width but exceeds 1080 in height.
Thought about it and it should have been labeled as a 768p,
it should play or stream ok on any 1080p capable device
|
|