Path: news.nzbot.com!news.astraweb.com!border6.newsrouter.astraweb.com!feed.news.qwest.net!mpls-nntp-03.inet.qwest.net!195.208.113.67.MISMATCH!goblin1!goblin2!goblin.stu.neva.ru!cyclone01.ams2.highwinds-media.com!voer-me.highwinds-media.com!peer01.iad.highwinds-media.com!news.highwinds-media.com!feed-me.highwinds-media.com!post01.iad.highwinds-media.com!fx14.iad.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Lab Lover <Labs@rule.com>
Newsgroups: alt.binaries.e-books
Subject: Re: Anyone else think Historiker is standing as a candidate for UKIP? <<< What's UKIP mean?
Message-ID: <4olmn9hgk2lm7h7tijbemue0qj7ot96k3j@4ax.com>
References: <lhkkn91m0blepri2n3rbe0be8rv2rt0lbi@4ax.com> <1mtev.40173$dF4.7104@fx27.fr7> <bookn9pnbccnva8id0dap3us3tjopa4rum@4ax.com> <h0bln99jfodk1eel36rvmh8fhatoinb5sl@4ax.com>
User-Agent: ForteAgent/7.10.32.1212
X-No-Archive: yes
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Lines: 95
X-Complaints-To: abuse@easynews.com
Organization: Easynews - www.easynews.com
X-Complaints-Info: Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers otherwise we will be unable to process your complaint properly.
Date: Tue, 20 May 2014 06:30:01 -0700
X-Received-Body-CRC: 3649378535
X-Received-Bytes: 5204
Xref: news.nzbot.com alt.binaries.e-books:219
On Mon, 19 May 2014 18:16:30 -0700, Gunner Asch <gunnerasch@gmail.com> wrote:
>On Mon, 19 May 2014 13:05:50 -0700, Lab Lover <Labs@rule.com> wrote:
>
>>On Mon, 19 May 2014 19:56:45 GMT, RIB <rib@rack.com> wrote:
>>
>>>In reply to "Lab Lover" who wrote the following:
>>>
>>>> On Mon, 19 May 2014 18:47:28 GMT, RIB <rib@rack.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> > In reply to "Lab Lover" who wrote the following:
>>>> >
>>>> > > On Mon, 19 May 2014 10:24:27 -0500, Flaco <Old_Fart@Home> wrote:
>>>> > >
>>>> > > > On Mon, 19 May 2014 10:22:45 -0500, Flaco <Old_Fart@Home> wrote:
>>>> > > >
>>>> > > > > On Sun, 18 May 2014 15:17:41 -0700, Lab Lover <Labs@rule.com> wrote:
>>>> > > > >
>>>> > > > >
>>>> > > > > >
>>>> > > > > > Incorrect. True conservatives value liberty above all.
>>>> > > > > >
>>>> > > > > > "Those who would give up essential Liberty, to purchase a little
>>>> > > > > > temporary
>>>> > > > > > Safety, deserve neither Liberty nor Safety."
>>>> > > > > >
>>>> > > > > > -Benjamin Franklin
>>>> > > > >
>>>> > > > > Agreed, but the current crop of "right" are NOT "true conservatives".
>>>> > > > >
>>>> > > > > No sacrifice (of the Peoples' rights) is too great to protect us
>>>> > > > > against terrorists. (see also "We had to destroy the village in order
>>>> > > > > to save it." and "If it saves one childs life!")
>>>> > > >
>>>> > > > I forgot "Only the Police should have guns."
>>>> > >
>>>> > > The above philosphy is wholeheartedly embraced by the left wing, Marxists,
>>>> > > Communists and progressives. Trying to paint conservatives with this
>>>> > > unattributed quote is completely fallacious.
>>>> >
>>>> > --------------------------------------------------
>>>> >
>>>> > I think your use of the word fallacious in this context is completely
>>>> > fallacious. Do you HAVE to sound like a complete knob! or is your first name
>>>> > Sheldon?
>>>>
>>>> How very Saul Alinsky of you. You have absolutely no counter argument, so you
>>>> attack the person who made the statement.
>>>>
>>>> I am sorry if your vocabulary is not up to the discussion at hand.
>>>>
>>>> I will show you the pity you deserve, here is the definition of the word you
>>>> object to.
>>>>
>>>> adj.
>>>> 1. Containing or based on a fallacy: a fallacious assumption.
>>>> 2. Tending to mislead; deceptive: fallacious testimony.
>>>>
>>>> Remember, it is never to late for you to get a high school diploma.
>>>
>>>------------------------------------
>>>
>>>I'm assuming "to" instead of "too" was a typo? or are you in need of a high
>>>school deploma yourself. Talk about the kettle calling the pot black -
>>>Hypocrite.
>>>
>>>I know only "too" well the meaning of the word fallacious. that's EXACTLY what
>>>I'm accusing you of being. You REALLY ARE A KNOB! It's been a long time since
>>>I've seen someone in the groups as far up his own arse as you. A "Sheldon"
>>>indeed. LMAO! Clue - "Sheldon" - "Big Bang Theory" Take a look and cringe.
>>
>>Ad hominem attacks are an excellent indication you have absolutely nothing to
>>contribute to the topic at hand. Thanks for playing, I accept your surrender.
>>
>>I love how liberals are incapable of conducting a civil debate and can only
>>attack, but do so in such an ineffectual manner.
>
>Thats their sole defense. When the average Lefty gets his back up
>against the wall...they always try diverson and intimidation, as they
>have nothing..nothing else to rely on.
>
>Their quiivers are empty, along with their heads
>
>Its quite amusing to watch. I enjoy baiting them until the dissolve
>in a puddle and then drain away through the cracks in the floor.
>
>Gunner
Thanks. I agree. Many progressives have adopted the Saul Alinsky tactic of
"attack, never debate". Unfortunately for them, their attacks are poorly
planned and they almost never evaluate the capabilities of their opponents.
I suppose that is what happens when you get your talking points and behavioral
examples from Steven Colbert, Jon Stewart and David Letterman....
|
| Follow-ups: | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 | 20 | 21 | 22 | 23 | 24 | 25 | 26 | 27 | 28 | 29 |
| 30 | 31 | 32 | 33 | 34 | 35 | 36 | 37 | 38 | 39 | 40 | 41 | 42 | 43 | 44 | 45 | 46 | 47 |
|