On Wed, 28 Jan 2015 10:17:07 -0500, Boyo@the.pub wrote:
>On Tue, 27 Jan 2015 19:28:25 -0600, TreeSaver <Enjoy!@gmail.com>
>wrote:
>
>>On Tue, 27 Jan 2015 14:09:18 -0500, Boyo@the.pub wrote:
>>
>>>On Tue, 27 Jan 2015 11:35:34 -0600, TreeSaver <Enjoy!@gmail.com>
>>>wrote:
>>>
>>>>On Tue, 27 Jan 2015 10:19:08 -0500, Boyo@the.pub wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>Uncensored? WTF? Strange as it seems for a pastoralist sci-fi writer
>>>>>Like Simak a sub-plot involving a Christian group seeking to block
>>>>>access to the time of Jesus had been hacked entirely from the edition
>>>>>that this was scanned from. That was NOT the Del Ray edition used for
>>>>>the cover and title page as that edition was used to restore the
>>>>>missing text. I felt it offensive that some editor at some point after
>>>>>the books initial publication felt free to remove sections of text he
>>>>>found offensive.
>>>>
>>>>How would I know if it was censored or not? Give me some example and I
>>>>will check the copys I have.
>>>>
>>>>TreeSaver
>>>
>>>Most but not all of it is in chapter 26. The full text version ends
>>>the chapter with "I had a gone feeling in my guts." The edited version
>>>removes all references to religion and in the one instance it didn't,
>>>chapter 23, replaced Jesus with Mohammud.
>>
>>You are right. Someone posted this in another group. Here you go.
>>Enjoy!
>>
>>TreeSaver
>
>Little confusion here. It was me that posted it. The text post was to
>explain why it was labeled as "Uncensored".
Sorry, I guess I had one of those senior moments.
TreeSaver
|
|