On Tue, 27 Jan 2015 19:28:25 -0600, TreeSaver <Enjoy!@gmail.com>
wrote:
>On Tue, 27 Jan 2015 14:09:18 -0500, Boyo@the.pub wrote:
>
>>On Tue, 27 Jan 2015 11:35:34 -0600, TreeSaver <Enjoy!@gmail.com>
>>wrote:
>>
>>>On Tue, 27 Jan 2015 10:19:08 -0500, Boyo@the.pub wrote:
>>>
>>>>Uncensored? WTF? Strange as it seems for a pastoralist sci-fi writer
>>>>Like Simak a sub-plot involving a Christian group seeking to block
>>>>access to the time of Jesus had been hacked entirely from the edition
>>>>that this was scanned from. That was NOT the Del Ray edition used for
>>>>the cover and title page as that edition was used to restore the
>>>>missing text. I felt it offensive that some editor at some point after
>>>>the books initial publication felt free to remove sections of text he
>>>>found offensive.
>>>
>>>How would I know if it was censored or not? Give me some example and I
>>>will check the copys I have.
>>>
>>>TreeSaver
>>
>>Most but not all of it is in chapter 26. The full text version ends
>>the chapter with "I had a gone feeling in my guts." The edited version
>>removes all references to religion and in the one instance it didn't,
>>chapter 23, replaced Jesus with Mohammud.
>
>You are right. Someone posted this in another group. Here you go.
>Enjoy!
>
>TreeSaver
TreeSaver
|
|