On Tue, 27 Jan 2015 14:09:18 -0500, Boyo@the.pub wrote:
>On Tue, 27 Jan 2015 11:35:34 -0600, TreeSaver <Enjoy!@gmail.com>
>wrote:
>
>>On Tue, 27 Jan 2015 10:19:08 -0500, Boyo@the.pub wrote:
>>
>>>Uncensored? WTF? Strange as it seems for a pastoralist sci-fi writer
>>>Like Simak a sub-plot involving a Christian group seeking to block
>>>access to the time of Jesus had been hacked entirely from the edition
>>>that this was scanned from. That was NOT the Del Ray edition used for
>>>the cover and title page as that edition was used to restore the
>>>missing text. I felt it offensive that some editor at some point after
>>>the books initial publication felt free to remove sections of text he
>>>found offensive.
>>
>>How would I know if it was censored or not? Give me some example and I
>>will check the copys I have.
>>
>>TreeSaver
>
>Most but not all of it is in chapter 26. The full text version ends
>the chapter with "I had a gone feeling in my guts." The edited version
>removes all references to religion and in the one instance it didn't,
>chapter 23, replaced Jesus with Mohammud.
You are right. Someone posted this in another group. Here you go.
Enjoy!
TreeSaver
|
|