On Mon, 19 May 2014 19:56:45 GMT, RIB <rib@rack.com> wrote:
>In reply to "Lab Lover" who wrote the following:
>
>> On Mon, 19 May 2014 18:47:28 GMT, RIB <rib@rack.com> wrote:
>>
>> > In reply to "Lab Lover" who wrote the following:
>> >
>> > > On Mon, 19 May 2014 10:24:27 -0500, Flaco <Old_Fart@Home> wrote:
>> > >
>> > > > On Mon, 19 May 2014 10:22:45 -0500, Flaco <Old_Fart@Home> wrote:
>> > > >
>> > > > > On Sun, 18 May 2014 15:17:41 -0700, Lab Lover <Labs@rule.com> wrote:
>> > > > >
>> > > > >
>> > > > > >
>> > > > > > Incorrect. True conservatives value liberty above all.
>> > > > > >
>> > > > > > "Those who would give up essential Liberty, to purchase a little
>> > > > > > temporary
>> > > > > > Safety, deserve neither Liberty nor Safety."
>> > > > > >
>> > > > > > -Benjamin Franklin
>> > > > >
>> > > > > Agreed, but the current crop of "right" are NOT "true conservatives".
>> > > > >
>> > > > > No sacrifice (of the Peoples' rights) is too great to protect us
>> > > > > against terrorists. (see also "We had to destroy the village in order
>> > > > > to save it." and "If it saves one childs life!")
>> > > >
>> > > > I forgot "Only the Police should have guns."
>> > >
>> > > The above philosphy is wholeheartedly embraced by the left wing, Marxists,
>> > > Communists and progressives. Trying to paint conservatives with this
>> > > unattributed quote is completely fallacious.
>> >
>> > --------------------------------------------------
>> >
>> > I think your use of the word fallacious in this context is completely
>> > fallacious. Do you HAVE to sound like a complete knob! or is your first name
>> > Sheldon?
>>
>> How very Saul Alinsky of you. You have absolutely no counter argument, so you
>> attack the person who made the statement.
>>
>> I am sorry if your vocabulary is not up to the discussion at hand.
>>
>> I will show you the pity you deserve, here is the definition of the word you
>> object to.
>>
>> adj.
>> 1. Containing or based on a fallacy: a fallacious assumption.
>> 2. Tending to mislead; deceptive: fallacious testimony.
>>
>> Remember, it is never to late for you to get a high school diploma.
>
>------------------------------------
>
>I'm assuming "to" instead of "too" was a typo? or are you in need of a high
>school deploma yourself. Talk about the kettle calling the pot black -
>Hypocrite.
>
>I know only "too" well the meaning of the word fallacious. that's EXACTLY what
>I'm accusing you of being. You REALLY ARE A KNOB! It's been a long time since
>I've seen someone in the groups as far up his own arse as you. A "Sheldon"
>indeed. LMAO! Clue - "Sheldon" - "Big Bang Theory" Take a look and cringe.
Ad hominem attacks are an excellent indication you have absolutely nothing to
contribute to the topic at hand. Thanks for playing, I accept your surrender.
I love how liberals are incapable of conducting a civil debate and can only
attack, but do so in such an ineffectual manner.
|
| Follow-ups: | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 | 20 | 21 | 22 | 23 | 24 | 25 | 26 | 27 | 28 | 29 |
| 30 | 31 | 32 | 33 | 34 | 35 | 36 | 37 | 38 | 39 | 40 | 41 | 42 | 43 | 44 | 45 | 46 | 47 |
|