Path: news.nzbot.com!news.astraweb.com!border6.newsrouter.astraweb.com!feed.news.qwest.net!mpls-nntp-02.inet.qwest.net!198.15.118.135.MISMATCH!us.feeder.erje.net!feeder.erje.net!eu.feeder.erje.net!goblin2!goblin.stu.neva.ru!cyclone01.ams2.highwinds-media.com!voer-me.highwinds-media.com!peer01.am1!peering.am1!peer01.fr7!news.highwinds-media.com!post01.fr7!fx27.fr7.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: RIB <rib@rack.com>
Newsgroups: alt.binaries.e-books
Subject: Re: Anyone else think Historiker is standing as a candidate for UKIP? <<< What's UKIP mean?
X-Newsreader: NewsLeecher v6.5 Beta 4 (http://www.newsleecher.com)
References: <lhkkn91m0blepri2n3rbe0be8rv2rt0lbi@4ax.com>
Lines: 66
Message-ID: <1mtev.40173$dF4.7104@fx27.fr7>
X-Complaints-To: http://www.newsleecher.com/support/
NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 19 May 2014 19:56:45 UTC
Date: Mon, 19 May 2014 19:56:45 GMT
X-Received-Body-CRC: 4285457290
X-Received-Bytes: 3331
Xref: news.nzbot.com alt.binaries.e-books:202
In reply to "Lab Lover" who wrote the following:
> On Mon, 19 May 2014 18:47:28 GMT, RIB <rib@rack.com> wrote:
>
> > In reply to "Lab Lover" who wrote the following:
> >
> > > On Mon, 19 May 2014 10:24:27 -0500, Flaco <Old_Fart@Home> wrote:
> > >
> > > > On Mon, 19 May 2014 10:22:45 -0500, Flaco <Old_Fart@Home> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > On Sun, 18 May 2014 15:17:41 -0700, Lab Lover <Labs@rule.com> wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Incorrect. True conservatives value liberty above all.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > "Those who would give up essential Liberty, to purchase a little
> > > > > > temporary
> > > > > > Safety, deserve neither Liberty nor Safety."
> > > > > >
> > > > > > -Benjamin Franklin
> > > > >
> > > > > Agreed, but the current crop of "right" are NOT "true conservatives".
> > > > >
> > > > > No sacrifice (of the Peoples' rights) is too great to protect us
> > > > > against terrorists. (see also "We had to destroy the village in order
> > > > > to save it." and "If it saves one childs life!")
> > > >
> > > > I forgot "Only the Police should have guns."
> > >
> > > The above philosphy is wholeheartedly embraced by the left wing, Marxists,
> > > Communists and progressives. Trying to paint conservatives with this
> > > unattributed quote is completely fallacious.
> >
> > --------------------------------------------------
> >
> > I think your use of the word fallacious in this context is completely
> > fallacious. Do you HAVE to sound like a complete knob! or is your first name
> > Sheldon?
>
> How very Saul Alinsky of you. You have absolutely no counter argument, so you
> attack the person who made the statement.
>
> I am sorry if your vocabulary is not up to the discussion at hand.
>
> I will show you the pity you deserve, here is the definition of the word you
> object to.
>
> adj.
> 1. Containing or based on a fallacy: a fallacious assumption.
> 2. Tending to mislead; deceptive: fallacious testimony.
>
> Remember, it is never to late for you to get a high school diploma.
------------------------------------
I'm assuming "to" instead of "too" was a typo? or are you in need of a high
school deploma yourself. Talk about the kettle calling the pot black -
Hypocrite.
I know only "too" well the meaning of the word fallacious. that's EXACTLY what
I'm accusing you of being. You REALLY ARE A KNOB! It's been a long time since
I've seen someone in the groups as far up his own arse as you. A "Sheldon"
indeed. LMAO! Clue - "Sheldon" - "Big Bang Theory" Take a look and cringe.
|
| Follow-ups: | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 | 20 | 21 | 22 | 23 | 24 | 25 | 26 | 27 | 28 | 29 |
| 30 | 31 | 32 | 33 | 34 | 35 | 36 | 37 | 38 | 39 | 40 | 41 | 42 | 43 | 44 | 45 | 46 | 47 |
|