Path: news.nzbot.com!not-for-mail
From: RIB <rib@rack.com>
Newsgroups: alt.binaries.documentaries
Subject: Re: (Ribble) - "Disc 2-7.zip" - No problems using VLC - "Disc 2-71.mkv"
X-Newsreader: NewsLeecher v6.5 Beta 6 (http://www.newsleecher.com)
References: <rm5dnb12onacb93isutn35sn46mq7t7v6h@4ax.com>
Lines: 60
Message-ID: <4ZKdz.99942$2y3.12441@fx10.fr7>
X-Complaints-To: http://www.newsleecher.com/support/
NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 02 Jul 2016 08:30:56 UTC
Date: Sat, 02 Jul 2016 08:30:56 GMT
X-Received-Body-CRC: 1535873801
X-Received-Bytes: 3036
Xref: news.nzbot.com alt.binaries.documentaries:6601
In reply to "Ribble" who wrote the following:
> On Fri, 01 Jul 2016 07:46:13 GMT, RIB <rib@rack.com> wrote:
>
> > In reply to "Ribble" who wrote the following:
> >
> > > On Thu, 30 Jun 2016 21:59:18 -0400, mike wrote:
> > >
> > > > using a hand held video camera to
> > > > record this.The discs don't show it.
> > >
> > > Yes, now I see that. It is because they ARE using a hand held video
> > > camera to record from still photos.
> > >
> > > The question could be why the DVD video does not do it.
> >
> > ----------------------------------------
> >
> > I'd like to see a before and after clip my self. Also Ribble, in your
> > handbrake
> > jpg, you show your abr as 300. do you use this setting or is it for
> > illustrative
> > purposes only? I've always found that the best quality over size is to set
> > it
> > between 1000-1200. I start to see artifacts much below these settings.
> >
> > RIB.
>
> Yes, 300kbps works fine for 99% of videos. Rarely, a video conversion
> does get jumpy movements and I double the video bitrate to fix.
> Moreso, instead of a fixed quality conversion, I wanted to use 2-pass
> conversion.
>
> My reasoning is that when comparing the original to the conversion, if
> I do not see artifacts, then the conversion with much smaller file
> size is what I save and delete the original. The alternative for me
> is to download, watch, delete, rather than archive conversions.
>
> Well, my conversions look fine on my computer, meaning the video
> conversions contain enough information to be watchable on my system,
> but not necessarily watchable or desired by others on other systems.
> Saving the original video is always better and posting the original
> (best quality) is always better. Larger HD downloads and uploads tend
> to overtax my internet speed and while I can watch in 1920x1200x 60Hz
> the effect of HD only lasts a few seconds.
>
> In the end, either I archive the converted file or save nothing. Like
> saving a library of paperbacks, or having no library at all with
> hardcover.
----------------------------------------------
I must admit that I only watch stuff om my 50+ tv. I also suffer from what
people around here call "Hunters eye" which means that put the two together and
I end up being very sensitive to artifacts.
Interesting feedback though - thanks :-)
RIB.
|
|