On Sun, 9 Nov 2014 06:10:43 +1100, CoRN <ciggl@me.me> wrote:
>On 2014-11-07 18:38:26 +1100, Redshift said:
>
>> In reply to "Me" who wrote the following:
>>
>>> Why do the rippers insist on using blurry old xvid ? x264 is easily
>>> superior, only someone in denial would try to argue that xvid is
>>> better. Maybe xvid was available on more players up until about 2012,
>>> but right now almost all players support mkv and x264 out the box.
>>>
>>> Maybe its some weird form of a superiority complex thats not superior.
>>>
>>> yes yes, go rip it myself blah blah blah
>>
>> No no, let's flesh out the 'blah blah blah': rip it, post it or shut the fuck
>> up.
>
>Intelligent response NOT.
>
>Me is right. x264 is far better than xvid - about the only reason to
>use xvid is that the coding speed is super fast , since it does bugger
>all.
================================================
Sumat is better than Nowt ! :)
========================================================
* If The Earth Didn't Suck...We Would ALL Fall Off !!! *
========================================================
|--Spike=-
|
| Follow-ups: | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 | 20 | 21 |
|