Path: news.nzbot.com!news.astraweb.com!border6.newsrouter.astraweb.com!not-for-mail
From: CoRN <ciggl@me.me>
Newsgroups: alt.binaries.documentaries
Date: Sun, 9 Nov 2014 06:10:43 +1100
Message-ID: <545e6ab3$0$39636$c3e8da3$f017e9df@news.astraweb.com>
References: <545bdbc5$0$24503$c3e8da3$f6268168@news.astraweb.com> <3vSdnVUurYNv68HJnZ2dnUU7-d-dnZ2d@supernews.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Subject: Re: XVID sux
User-Agent: Unison/2.1.10
Lines: 22
Organization: Unlimited download news at news.astraweb.com
NNTP-Posting-Host: 6f7129ca.news.astraweb.com
X-Trace: DXC=e6Ea9PIj@@Q]oQN>6;?:kYL?0kYOcDh@ZjX]jb@JPA_TgPcD:Q0cg>SKdim;<8^L;Qc5_Y>feR_9_O[1c1DWZRm^]aC17fh]6kQ=]XGO]6nRV]
Xref: news.nzbot.com alt.binaries.documentaries:1153
On 2014-11-07 18:38:26 +1100, Redshift said:
> In reply to "Me" who wrote the following:
>
>> Why do the rippers insist on using blurry old xvid ? x264 is easily
>> superior, only someone in denial would try to argue that xvid is
>> better. Maybe xvid was available on more players up until about 2012,
>> but right now almost all players support mkv and x264 out the box.
>>
>> Maybe its some weird form of a superiority complex thats not superior.
>>
>> yes yes, go rip it myself blah blah blah
>
> No no, let's flesh out the 'blah blah blah': rip it, post it or shut the fuck
> up.
Intelligent response NOT.
Me is right. x264 is far better than xvid - about the only reason to
use xvid is that the coding speed is super fast , since it does bugger
all.
|
| Follow-ups: | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 | 20 | 21 |
|