On Tue, 22 Sep 2009 11:45:32 +1000, hopper
<Troll5layer@ABCP.hall.0.fame.invalid> wrote:
>On Sat, 19 Sep 2009 22:21:22 -0500, in alt.binaries.crafts.pictures
>noone2 <noone2@hushmail.com> wrote:
>
>>When I received this post, message "section 8 unavailable". Is it
>>possible to resend? Thank you
>
>mmmm.. two things at work here, noone2.
>
>The person you are asking has no cloo on what h/she is doing,
>and refuses to take any advice.
>The posts you refer to contain drek (corrupt code) which
>a newsreader will not decode.
>This topic was done to death just last week.
>Either:
>1. killfile the poster - you will miss nothing of value.
>or
>2. Ask someone who 'says' they got the post to repost it.
>Be aware there is an element of risk in that option as
>a.) many here would not know if a post is complete or not
>and
>b.) there are some who think it hilarious to acknowledge posts as
>being good when in fact they are trash.
>
>.. by the way, how did that 5.6GB download
>work out for you?
>
>thanks
I'm behind with my reading, but had to get back to you. Hopper, you
are a wicked, wicked person, but I love it! I can see you are a calls
em how they sees em person.
And no, I've put the 5.6GB out of my mind
|
|