On Thu, 10 Sep 2009 18:53:46 +0100, in alt.binaries.crafts.pictures mm
<mm1975@wap.dol.ie> wrote:
>niemand mailed:
>>On 10 Sep 2009 12:17:31 GMT, "hopper" <hopper@abcp.posting.invalid>
>>wrote:
>>
>>>
>>>pls ignore all other attempts at reposting.
>>>use this archive only for the reduced footprint of AG posting.
>>
>>To late, i already downloade post:
>>Message-ID: <5dSpm.208434$vp.34570@newsfe12.iad>
>>
>>I can imagine you go for less quality of files if you have to pay by
>>the MB you download and pay by the minute you are on line.
>>
>>And even the pro's fuck up sometimes i see.
>
>There is no land service in our area for Internet
>travel. Use of pay service is our only access.
>http://www.vodafone.ie/helpsupport/mobileoffice/blackberry/service/internet/
>
>Making something from gigantic posts I avoid.
>Where the puzzle for us is how is the same
>file put up in two bits so radically changed in
>size?
The original files have been ripped directly from a CD issue.
Restructuring the format for posting into a file share environment
(Usenet) is standard procedure for those savvy posters.
>Made easy to take the small posting.
>What is changed from the big posting
>you have?
>
The files are the same in output.
All that has changed is the packing.
>bonny
|
|