Path: news.nzbot.com!spool1.sonic-news.com!news-out.sonic-news.com!not.news-service.com!not.alt.net!not.highwinds-media.com!news.astraweb.com!border5.newsrouter.astraweb.com!not-for-mail
From: hopper <Troll5layer@avay.invalid>
X-Newsreader: Forte Agent 1.93/32.576 English (American)
Newsgroups: alt.binaries.crafts.pictures
Subject: Re: Req. Would someone please digitize this (1/1)
Date: Tue, 25 Aug 2009 07:28:03 +1000
Organization: set Path -9999 Trolls
References: <i3av851e34cd7m3ng4e5vv6gl4qso7s19r@4ax.com> <0li5959fkt3fe9ov5snfmrh32vbr6ej3kb@4ax.com>
X-No-Archive: yes
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Lines: 10
Message-ID: <004c1a19$0$5020$c3e8da3@news.astraweb.com>
NNTP-Posting-Host: 151957ee.news.astraweb.com
X-Trace: DXC=dCO7GYlOg4A0UO2<>T]L;AL?0kYOcDh@J;GFDAYE_l2CdaFg1GWPFfEDW:P`]bM`VN>JRBhPOH3mBQY^`9H\U`UO
Xref: news.nzbot.com alt.binaries.crafts.pictures:8939
Snakepit@pit.com, wrote
>On Sat, 22 Aug 2009 03:12:34 -0500, Paperboy
><paperboy@whoknowswhere.com> wrote:
>
>Can you possibly scan the image instead of taking a photograph? A
>scanned image is much more "workable" than one that is only a
>photograph.
'ere 'ere... even a scan of a print with "sharps" on
is going to produce something halfway "workable".
|
|