Snakepit@pit.com, wrote
>On Sat, 22 Aug 2009 03:12:34 -0500, Paperboy
><paperboy@whoknowswhere.com> wrote:
>
>Can you possibly scan the image instead of taking a photograph? A
>scanned image is much more "workable" than one that is only a
>photograph.
'ere 'ere... even a scan of a print with "sharps" on
is going to produce something halfway "workable".
|
|