Pixie <Pixie@AnnWheatley.com>wrote:
>On Sat, 22 Aug 2009 22:33:19 +0930, hopper <Troll5layer@home.invalid>
>wrote:
>
>> Pixie <Pixie@AnnWheatley.com> wrote:
>>
>>/snipT
>>
>>>And so flares the fires of another pile of feathers... /grin
>>>/throws a tin of petrol... a couple of spray cans... just for effect.
>>>
>>dun toldja you were gunna get it.. now..
>>
>>/pinches the nose
>>
>Hey.... watch it! I'm not Pinocchio!
>
Agreed.. I have not read bullshit from
your corner.. ever.
And it is such a tinky weenie nose!
Tips of fingers only type pinch.. mheh
>>/pulls down the lip
>>
>Hey.... gently!
>
Then there is the teeth!
I wont tell you how you open a
stallion's mouth when he clamps down.
You really don't want to know <BG>
>>.. now say .. "arrrrgh"
>>
>EH! You wish.
>
Ah (me) is a gennlemenz..
>>/me dumps dumps in attached--<Pixie_n_earWigs.hus>
>>
>ROFL..... subtle.... verrry subtle...You're a bricklayer? Right?!
>
ummm...
.. mekanikuhl henginbeer B.Sc.Eng [ret] , actually,
but you nebber heared it from me.. mkay?
There is merit in building the fundamentals before adding the plum
shaded curtains, ya noe ..//LMAO
>>>Eh? - is the assumption of agreement, regardless of opinion. Akin to
>>>TIA. You are EXPECTED to agree/comply. The requester is not
>>>particularly interested if you disagree, they are not listening.
>>>Hopper's favourite..../grin
>>>
>>
>>cos we (the uttereer) is right. There are no other variables. .heh
>>
>And we, the Utteree, are sitting on the variable...
>Such an important LITTLE variable..../check mate.
>
welllllll..
/fondles family jewels
..yeah, you got a point there [pun]
<gulp>
>>>Aye? - is asking the question "Do you agree?".... Accepted as wanting
>>>to know another's opinion....and a willingess to listen to the reply.
>>>Agreement is optional and the ensuing debate should be expected.
>>>My favourite.../laff
>>>
>>/shakes head..
>>Suvveners!
>>It's in the "accint" Ms. Pixie.. the inflection.
>>"aye" is what Poms and sailors use..!
>>
>And who do you think settled here over 200 years ago... Poms and
>sailors... how 'bout that....
>English and Irish descent parents had I.
>
Give the whole deal the Charles Darwin twist,, yeh, like think
evolution?
After Ned (Kelly) got himself battered with .308 rounds and eventually
hung..the rest of our (my) mad Orish had a big think about just where
things were headed in "Sydney Town" and made the very smart decision
to go North and build Queensland!
Now, Muffie (memories) is going to jump on his "queer" theme with that
bit of information, but none-the-less this is why it is our (mine)
"Irish descent parents" were the cream of the crop!!
Sorry you ended up with the blunt end of the heritage stick.. but like
Darwin says.. somebody had to provide the lesson in not what to do :-D
>>.. but just to prove it...
>>
>>
>>/me dumps dumps in attached--<Pixie_n_earWigs.hus>
>>
>/me bets ya no one gets it..../laffs on you!
>
Give it time.. eh?
The concept is new, true.. but if I have anything to do with the
future here in ABCP then I fully expect the artists to show their nose
and do more.
All that is needed is for someone to stick their
neck out.. and laff about it.
[neck fully extended, and PML]
>>My bat is bigger 'han yours..
>>
>/censored.... nope.... I won't be drawn.... /cackle...
>
/nods
yeh.. I should not have posted that.
Call it "male pride"?
I read you tearing strips off us guys in your exchange with MamaT.
Some of it stung a bit.
Like think of it this way.. if it is possible for a gal.
We (menzfolk) have idiots as Muffie (memories) ranting on about how
men in embroidery froups are poofters, yet we also have the gals
fanning themselves mumbling we (menzfolk) are testosterone driven
baboons!
Maybe it gets all a bit much so us (menzfolk) just break out into
Gibbonese occasionally??
/chuckles
>>>It's all about the listening and nothing about the ASSuming.
>>>/licks fingers.....zzzzzt..... yer ear hairs are still smokin'....
>>>rofl
>>>
>>Nup.. my ears is fine .. and full..
>>
>The clue, Ladies, the clue.....
>
heh heh .. you are feeding the cabbage patch again :-~
>>>"Here" being "there".... You can tell He has never set foot out of
>>>cane country.... /grin
>>
>>muuummmmF..
>>"I been everywhere man".. know the song?
>>
>You ain't been "everywhere".... rofl.
>
Well.. not yet.. but I haint "popping off" in a waaay long time yet.
I retired early to enjoy myself. GFC or no GFC I am going to do just
that. Push come to shove I can easy exist with just a swag and a road
ahead.
Long as I have a laptop and net-sat connection the World is endless,
with "the wide brown plains" just a step away :-)
>>Slim Dusty, I believe, eh.
>>
>Geoff Mack... No "eh" about it.
>Call yerself an Aussie...../rolls eyes.
Ok Ok .. darn pixies...
>Old Slim would never get his gob around that song! He woulda spat his
>teeth out.../laff
>
I only mentioned Slim as I know the old turd stole most of what he
sung.. so I reckon you would have to have been everywhere to have
gathered the collection (he had).
Anyway.. does not change the fact I know everything [tic]
>>>Too much American television, I'm thinking.
>>>Mine is "two times"..... it's friggin' TWICE ..../grrrr. I nearly died
>>>when I heard Oprah say it one day.
>>>Two times are tables learnt in first grade..../rolls eyes.
>>>
>>When you is so dumb like us "Northern Bushies" it is maybe
>>fourth grade before that cane stops whackin' ya!
>>
>Apparently! By then you have started to enjoy it a tad too much
>though... /grin
>
I think it is the drumming on the numbness that does it. Like watching
your educator sweat as they beat themselves into a frenzy.. beating on
you! //LMAO
>>After that we get real smart.. compoundingly so..
>>
>Yer tellin' the story...
>
zacery <BG>
>>>Since my form of helping is trying to guide Newb's through each step,
>>>as women tend to do so it's clear, I often have to stay silent. I
>>>don't want to risk confusing them more. They don't tend to take well
>>>to being told to go look it up and having to read it for themselves.
>>>
>>Took me a while to work this out.. but I did get there, eventually :->
>>
>Not being a woman, it would have been above you.....rofl
>
Yes, well .. there are times for a man when it is best he says
nothing?
And one of those is when a woman is above one.. if you get my drift,
eh.
>>>If I can point directly to what they have to do with the least amount
>>>of instructions, they usually get brave and explore the program on
>>>their own later, in their own time. Win/win.
>>>Marsfel is a success story of this type of help. I know that when
>>>women ask "what am I doing wrong", they are really just asking "tell
>>>me what to do - in words of two syllables or less!"
>>>I can't do that if I don't know what they are looking at.
>>>
>>This is where the screenshots come in.. nobody is going to load
>>half a dozen newsreaders just to accommodate all the
>>variables.. well, nobody sane, that is.
>>
>Sometimes I think they don't know they have options. And free one's at
>that.
>
It takes time to fully explore a computer beyond what we want right
now.
I laff my arse off when I hear the sales person ask the newbie ..
"And what do you want to do with the computer?"
"Oh.. send email, it is cheaper than ringing my daughter".
Hard not to PML.. right there, right then.
"Paint" ships with all Windows versions. Lame as it is it does
do the basics.
>>I do believe some here have done just that in order to mimic
>>the work I do with one newsreader.. but that too is another
>>argument in another place :-D
>>
>Braggart.
>
/nods
[cue Sybil]
"..and he is such a pig with it!"
"I know"
"does he ever shut up?"
"I know"
"but he has such a huuuuge.. coll^^rection"
"I know"
[/Sybil]
/rotfL
>>>That is my reason. More technical reasons are that Agent lost a bit of
>>>its integrity with later versions, but that is for the teckheads to
>>>fight about.
>>>
>>>AYE??!!
>>>
>>Roger that!
>>
>Finally, you agree with something! Worried about those variables, was
>ya?? rofl...
>
.. worried about "who is on top".. I reckon <g.
You play hard, Woman :-)
>>umm.. just cos I is tired, and to save clutter with another post,,
>>I have attached a Harry Potter work I spun up.. your comments please?
>>Thanks Pixie.. and enjoy your gift <g>
>>
>/tears of laughter at "gift", rolling down my face.... I had to use
>every skerick of imagination I could muster....!
>
.. good eh:-)
I had hours of fun building it.
Digging up the artwork was a whole load of fun on its own.. hoeing up
old roads of past times and many truly enjoyable hours spent
"gawking".
My two bobs worth??
Both "alternative life-stylers" and "straights" share one basic almost
animal element of desire.. the nekkid human form.
As natural as that is - for those coupled in unison - at the climax it
is how we got here today.. every single one of us, even the maroons,
as Muffiie (memories).
Beauty is in the eye of the beholder, it is said.. I digitised what I
saw.. in your posts.
>As for Gryffindor logo?....... It's not yer best work. And that's not
>a criticism. You knows it yerself.
>
Yeh.. it was "knocked up".. to use a MamaT quote <g>
>The logo IS complicated. There are a million colour combinations and
>layering to deal with and detail that would take a pro HOURS to
>digitise. This is not a click and go logo. Most auto digitising
>programs would have gone into meltdown.
>It would HAVE to be manually punched. And by that I mean sectioned.
>If you downloaded the Harry Potter files posted recently, you will see
>this logo is not enclosed. The "easier" logos have been tackled. This
>one is not for the faint hearted. I noted stitches missing in some of
>those files, one should study them before they sew them. Some are a
>good attempt, some not so good.
>
Ok.. so I should not rush into including this one in my HP set?
I had a look at the rest of the HP that were posted
and, really, they are pretty ordinary.. you think?
>Stitch length on background is good. Hey! You had a crack at underlay
>stitches! Finally, someone attempts underlay stitching for
>stabilisation! It's mostly going the wrong direction.... but it's
>there!
>
My problem is in knowing where to place it and what stitch lengths etc
to set. Every design seems to have different demands?
Is there some sort of base 'rule' one can apply, or is it all just
"what you reckon on the day"??
>Lots of detail is missing, but like I said, this is a logo that would
>cost a mint to have done professionally (and no one would take on the
>Potter litigation empire anyway), and would take a long time to do.
>
You know what I reckon?
I reckon that image was lifted from like a graphics set for HP. Never
was it intended for digi.. the 3D is just impossible! Period.
>It was a good crack at displaying just how much people don't
>understand what they are requesting of the hack digitisers in here.
>And I say "hack" with the utmost respect. I mean Amateurs having a go.
>Digitising is an art, it isn't learnt overnight.
>
Ditto for "haXoring" per se.. despite what the script kiddies using
bot-nets will tell you :-/
and speraking of kidies?
Those pr0n avi files have now been replaced by warez headers.. still
malware but you see the change?
Remember the other day I was pointing at why no warez is posted to
ABCP? That will pay off now, hopefuly as the Ladies will not download
these posts... I hope.
>Time for bed. We are limping in the cricket and just got beat by a
>whisker by the Kiwis in the Rugby.... can't win a trick!
>
Fully dawn here and a big brilliant day in front of me.. how many more
can be so just that bit better is beyond me.
Maybe a pixie knows?
>/looks at Pixie graphic again....... rofl...
>
>Pixie :-)
Have to leave the fun for a bit.. I promised one request for music
alpha so I best get that done before any more "playtime".. heh
.. thanks for the spa [pun]
|
| Follow-ups: | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 | 20 | 21 | 22 | 23 | 24 | 25 | 26 | 27 | 28 | 29 |
| 30 | 31 | 32 |
|