I get it and appreciate your telling it like you see it. You again
are correct. It is presumptive. I do thank you for your the work you
put into helping those of us who do not digitize. Your time is
valuable and I for one am thankful that you choose to share your
talent.
On Thu, 13 Aug 2009 10:46:00 +0930, hopper <Troll5layer@home.invalid>
wrote:
>On Wed, 12 Aug 2009 10:18:36 -0500,
>in alt.binaries.crafts.pictures Paperboy
><paperboy@whoknowswhere.com> wrote:
>
>
>>On Wed, 12 Aug 2009 22:35:28 +0930, hopper <Troll5layer@home.invalid>
>>wrote:
>>
>/snipT
>
>>>I guess at the end of the day it is
>>>yourself wearing the garment the logo is
>>>mounted on, yes? So, invoking "the customer is
>>>always right", I make this post in asking
>>>"are you **certain** you want that change?".
>>>
>>>An explanation would be nice but if that
>>>is asking too much then a simple "yes" or "no"
>>>will get me rehashing the whole design.. no worries.
>>
>>You know you are absolutely correct. I guess it is the 2009/2010
>>season???? The math just is not there. I went back and looked at the
>>picture as you indicated, and the 1960 is what is on the picture. It
>>puzzles me as well. There is no need to redo the wonderfully
>>digitized design. Thank you for your hard work.
>>
>>But I like the last two pictures that you posted for me to refer to.
>>If you are able to find some time, would mind digitizing those for me?
>>I would really appreciate it.
>>
>.. no worries, I will work on putting a set together, yes?
>Won't be tomorrow kind of thing, I have stuff happening
>around me here always so computer time is like "at a
>premium" :-)
>
>One little thing you might consider doing for me, if I
>could be so selfish?
>I hear your appreciation and that is great as a projection,
>but Usenet is not really about gratification aside from giving
>what is given freely only because one can and one wants to.
>Using "TIA" comes across as really presumptive, and whilst
>I cannot do a damned thing about folks using it
>(its a left over from the AOL days) it really grates me to see
>it used in respect of anything I might choose to contribute.
>I know many here are very appreciative, equally I am happy
>to help out those striving to keep the spirit of ABCP alive
>and healthy. The TIA thing for me is therefore redundant.
>So how about, in at least any missives aimed my way, we
>agree to drop it.
>This is not a "condition".. just good sense as advice.
>I trust you can 'get' where I am coming from :-)
|
|