On Wed, 13 May 2009 21:20:58 -0700, Herb <Herb@the.herb.garden> wrote:
>wifeof hnc wrote:
>
>> My husband reads this newsgroup and comes up with something for me
>> every now and then.
>>
>> He tried to get a jpg of a horse that we will be getting Monday 5/18
>> along with her colt, digitized for me so I could do it for the twins.
>>
>> So far no gp.
>>
>> Jim tried but he is not there yet.
>>
>> He saw you back again after your computer problem and told me to see
>> if you might be able to do it.
>>
>> I would rather use the picture of Sara the something found on line.
>>
>> It you can give it a try, I would be thankul. If you are unable to do
>> it there is no problem.
>>
>> Jim will keep trying.
>>
>> Wife of havenoclue
>
>Photographs are particularly difficult to digitize, either manually or
>programatically.
>
>I would agree with SimplyMe's suggestion that if you really want an
>embroidered image that you find an appropriately similar existing
>realistic horse design.
>
>Another approach that would be a LOT easier and end up with a much
>better result would be to take your image(s) and transfer them to
>fabric. You can easily obtain fabric sheets that can be fed through an
>ink-jet printer and produce striking results. You could then either
>piece into or applique onto your final product.
>
> - Herb
Thanks for the information.
|
|