24hrembroiderer@mnsi.cominvalid> wrote:
>This is the version that has been around for a while.
>
/nods
thanks for that.
I thought as much, just couldn't be
bothered with sorting Rosie's
mess.. as a download.
[shrug]
>Yes it kicks off the virus programs but its a decent copy.
>
With 'modern' AV definitions most patched software will
do this.. comes with the territory, if you like.
One really needs to know what one is doing IF playing
with _new_ releases.
As you say, tried and proven stuff is fine.
>Been trying to use it for for simple designs, but I am just
>not that good and my stuff looks like blobs.
>
I will _give_ you this much help - for the rest you are going
to do have to do what I did... that is, watch and pick up hints
AND
RTFM for the application you use.
My freely given advice is this.
IF you are trying to feed an image (picture) into an automated
("do it for me") digitising program, just forget it, right now.
You will spend far more time with "I fixed it in Embird" than it
takes to manually punch a design out, and have it correct.
Now,, I tell you I was given that advice 7years ago, and
ignored it. I paid... with years of trying to find an application
that would do what they _ALL_ say they will do on the respective
websites. That promotional stuff is bunkum, a con, _believe_ that!
It is not _you_ it IS the software.
As far as CAD processes are concerned the embroidery industry
is littered with applications which are maybe up to 15years behind
in software development.
"Rural tools" is a kind description:-/
Some... *some* handle stitch modes in different ways, setting
them above others in usefulness.
To get a halfway decent design you have to plan the
sequence, select your stitch mode and plot the
pathways. There is no "quick way".... m'kay?
Also.. if it helps ..?.. the advice came from Don (res0y7ux@msn.com).
At that time I thought him quite "brain damaged".. that turned out to
be my most significant mistake in many a Usenet year.
>Downloaded and installed on laptop after that
>reallyweird message about the post.
>
Yes, clueless individuals with nothing better to do than post
"henny pennys".
>Its the same post in the sameformat that has been on here for ages
>so lost as to what the problem is. But then I am just a brain damaged
>invalid who knows nothing.
You had no problem remembering CnS history.. so good
luck with your recovery.
--
kit
|
|