On Wed, 16 Mar 2011 06:35:01 +1000, MsMarple <Ch@momile.tea.any.one> wrote
in:
<z4Qfp.308993$Mg5.40609@en-nntp-06.dc1.easynews.com>:
>24hrembroiderer@mnsi.netwrote:
>>Would love this one but any baby feet in a small size will do. Thanks.
>
>It is understood - taken as a"given", even - that you, Gayle,
>being a Texan and all, would be a mite more "hard nosed"
>than the usual "run-0-D-mill" American citizen.
>Trust me. I know what I am saying, it doesn't take a whole
>rehash of the method used to setup Lee Harvey Oswald
>to convince me you Longhorn guys are soft targets, for a fall.
>
>You choose to ignore the advice given on using a domain
>which does not belong to you, Gayle. Fine.. some lessons
>some peeps have to learn the hard way.
>Again, trust me, somewhere someone with a nose for these
>things will rip you a new "asshole", privately.
>
>However, this not the topic of my post.
>The attached is, Gayle.
>But first I quote from the tutorials;
> never more important when uploading files from
> your system. As malignant as any virus or Trojan
> the seeding of trash from archives into Usenet is
> both a security risk and an indulgence on the time
> of your audience.
>Gayle..
>universally held as "trash" on Usenet. They present a huge
>security risk, on equal pegging as executables (*.exe) and
>must include in posts, today.
Forgive my computer/Usenet ignorance here, but does this also include a
text file created in notepad? Will that also carry the same information as
MS Word?
>
>Just do not do it - upload MS Word files.
>
>The "Why"?
>You look around the Net using "exploit" and "Word document"
>as search terms and you will soon frighten yourself more
>than I could possibly inject here in ABCP with my
>attachment, trust me on that.
>
>The attachment shows you what you cannot possibly see
>in a Word document without some extra tools and the skills
>to decode the output. I have those abilities, so do thousands
>of others. Microsoft -- in their efforts to dumbdown computer
>tasks -- include all sorts of interesting stuff _about you_
>in the Word document output, stuff YOU as the user are
>blind to.
>You have no activity in ABCP that isn't very "normal" for
>Usenet, and none I can see that is in any way "illegal" as
>such. That aside, there are those wankers in this world
>who will take what they find (in your document) and use it
>to harasses you. This has happened in ABCP before today.
>And trust me, they were Americans that did the harassing.
>
>You go think about that, Gayle.
>Think real hard... before you leap to and play "Blazing Saddles"
>with my advice :-/
|
|