On Thu, 03 Jun 2010 09:49:14 +1000, hopper
<hoÞÞer@forteinc.user-base.net.invalid> wrote:
>bates <bates@motel.com>wrote:
>>On Wed, 02 Jun 2010 05:50:22 -0400, holita <holita@dog.com> wrote:
>>
>>>hopper recently posted a smaller version of the design, i'll do a 4x4
>>>& post it soon.
>>Thank you. The posted design had some issues.
>>Your help would be appreciated.
>>
>.. fair enough<g>
>See my other comment today - written earlier.
>
>errrr..mmmm..
>Where there is a problem with a design be very sure to
>post what the problem is, yeh??.
>We are not professionals (digi-peeps) here, and you
>(the requestor) help us (the digi-peeps) by explaining
>where the design is borked.
>Nobody (genuine) is going to take offence at
>constructive critique.
>
>pheh..,.. IF they do __I___ will flame the freckle off
>**them**..!
> /lmao
>
>cheers
I do sincerely appreciate the products produced
by those of you who have digitizing abilities. I do not have any.
The only issues with the design posted, were the fills were loose, but
as you explained, it was a fast poke at it, and it was appreciated.
Thank you for your updated version. I will give it a sew out.
|
|